WTID vs. FEPI
WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and FEPI (REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTID is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while FEPI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX. WTID is passively managed, while FEPI is actively managed. Over the past year, WTID returned -74.04% vs 13.96% for FEPI. Their -0.01 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. WTID charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FEPI.
Performance
WTID vs. FEPI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -67.32% return, which is significantly lower than FEPI's 1.10% return.
WTID
- 1D
- 4.70%
- 1M
- -32.80%
- 6M
- -56.78%
- YTD
- -67.32%
- 1Y
- -74.04%
- 3Y*
- -45.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -43.47%
FEPI
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- 6M
- 2.65%
- YTD
- 1.10%
- 1Y
- 13.96%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 16.78%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $8.05M | $8.48M | $9.46M | |
| $198.95K | $195.92K | $630.81K |
WTID vs. FEPI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -67.32% | -44.50% | -7.93% | 8.14% |
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | 1.10% | 18.33% | 15.69% | 11.75% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTID and FEPI is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 11, 2023 | -0.01 |
The correlation between WTID and FEPI shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (all time) to 0.19 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
WTID vs. FEPI - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WTID
FEPI
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
WTID
FEPI
-
Basic Materials
WTID
-
FEPI
-
Communication Services
WTID
-
FEPI
Consumer Cyclical
WTID
-
FEPI
Consumer Defensive
WTID
-
FEPI
-
Financial Services
WTID
-
FEPI
-
Healthcare
WTID
-
FEPI
-
Industrials
WTID
-
FEPI
-
Real Estate
WTID
-
FEPI
-
Technology
WTID
-
FEPI
Utilities
WTID
-
FEPI
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTID vs. FEPI — Risk / Return Rank
WTID
FEPI
WTID vs. FEPI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTID | FEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.80 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.29 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.14 | -0.37 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 0.94 | -1.91 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 2.79 | -4.28 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTID vs. FEPI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, which is greater than FEPI's maximum drawdown of -23.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and FEPI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTID | FEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.80% | -23.56% | -67.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.06% | -14.96% | -61.10% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.73% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.37% | -9.77% | -80.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.96% | -3.74% | -52.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.62% | 5.02% | +44.60% |
Volatility
WTID vs. FEPI - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 23.44% compared to REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF (FEPI) at 7.76%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEPI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTID | FEPI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.44% | 7.76% | +15.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.62% | 15.78% | +40.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.15% | 19.43% | +49.72% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.60% | 19.58% | +51.02% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.60% | 19.58% | +51.02% |
WTID vs. FEPI - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than FEPI's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTID vs. FEPI - Dividend Comparison
WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FEPI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.43%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
FEPI REX FANG & Innovation Equity Premium Income ETF | 26.43% | 25.48% | 27.18% | 4.21% |
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTID and FEPI have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTID has higher volatility (23.44%) compared to FEPI (7.76%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.80% vs FEPI's -23.56%.
On 1-year performance, FEPI leads with 13.96% vs -74.04% for WTID. On fees, FEPI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, FEPI has been the lower-risk option at 7.76%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, FEPI has performed better with a 13.96% return vs -74.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FEPI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTID.
FEPI has the higher dividend yield at 26.43%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.
WTID is categorized as Inverse Equities, while FEPI is Derivative Income. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTID and 0.65% for FEPI.
FEPI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTID and FEPI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer