WTID vs. ERX
WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and ERX (Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares) are both exchange-traded funds - WTID is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while ERX is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTID returned -45.60%/yr vs 16.84%/yr for ERX. Their -0.97 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. WTID charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.91%/yr for ERX.
Performance
WTID vs. ERX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -67.32% return, which is significantly lower than ERX's 66.56% return.
WTID
- 1D
- 4.70%
- 1M
- -32.80%
- 6M
- -56.78%
- YTD
- -67.32%
- 1Y
- -74.04%
- 3Y*
- -45.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- -43.47%
ERX
- 1D
- -2.60%
- 1M
- 20.71%
- 6M
- 34.28%
- YTD
- 66.56%
- 1Y
- 81.13%
- 3Y*
- 16.84%
- 5Y*
- 36.03%
- 10Y*
- -9.07%
- ALL TIME*
- -7.12%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $21.45M | $22.83M | $28.29M | |
| $198.95K | $195.92K | $630.81K |
WTID vs. ERX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -67.32% | -44.50% | -7.93% | -16.93% |
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 66.56% | 2.79% | 1.09% | -15.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTID and ERX is -0.96, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.96 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2023 | -0.97 |
The correlation between WTID and ERX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.97 to -0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
WTID vs. ERX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WTID
ERX
Energy
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
WTID
ERX
Basic Materials
WTID
-
ERX
-
Communication Services
WTID
-
ERX
-
Consumer Cyclical
WTID
-
ERX
-
Consumer Defensive
WTID
-
ERX
-
Financial Services
WTID
-
ERX
-
Healthcare
WTID
-
ERX
-
Industrials
WTID
-
ERX
-
Real Estate
WTID
-
ERX
-
Technology
WTID
-
ERX
-
Utilities
WTID
-
ERX
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTID vs. ERX — Risk / Return Rank
WTID
ERX
WTID vs. ERX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WTID | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.77 | 1.29 | -0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.98 | 2.72 | -3.70 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.49 | 6.90 | -8.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WTID vs. ERX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.80%, smaller than the maximum ERX drawdown of -99.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and ERX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTID | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -90.80% | -99.54% | +8.74% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -76.06% | -29.97% | -46.09% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -86.73% | -42.34% | -44.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -46.90% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -98.59% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -90.37% | -91.59% | +1.22% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -55.96% | -67.25% | +11.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 49.62% | 11.81% | +37.81% |
Volatility
WTID vs. ERX - Volatility Comparison
MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 23.44% compared to Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares (ERX) at 12.43%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ERX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTID | ERX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.44% | 12.43% | +11.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 56.62% | 33.84% | +22.78% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 69.15% | 42.28% | +26.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 70.60% | 51.50% | +19.10% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 70.60% | 68.84% | +1.76% |
WTID vs. ERX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than ERX's 0.91% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTID vs. ERX - Dividend Comparison
WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ERX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.53%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ERX Direxion Daily Energy Bull 2X Shares | 1.53% | 2.54% | 2.94% | 3.17% | 2.23% | 2.16% | 2.35% | 1.56% | 3.10% | 0.85% |
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WTID and ERX have a correlation of -0.96, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WTID has higher volatility (23.44%) compared to ERX (12.43%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.80% vs ERX's -99.54%.
On 3-year performance, ERX leads with 16.84% vs -45.60% for WTID. On fees, ERX is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, ERX has been the lower-risk option at 12.43%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ERX has performed better with a 16.84% return vs -45.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ERX is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTID.
ERX has the higher dividend yield at 1.53%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.
WTID is categorized as Inverse Equities, while ERX is Energy Equities. WTID tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while ERX tracks Energy Select Sector Index (200%). They also come from different issuers: REX and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTID and 0.91% for ERX.
ERX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.93 vs -1.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTID and ERX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer