WTID vs. DRLL

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WTID (MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and DRLL (Strive U.S. Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WTID is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while DRLL is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WTID returned -48.40%/yr vs 14.67%/yr for DRLL. At a correlation of -0.98, they often move in opposite directions. WTID charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.41%/yr for DRLL.

Performance

WTID vs. DRLL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTID achieves a -62.23% return, which is significantly lower than DRLL's 31.26% return.

WTID

• 1D: -3.31%
• 1M: -1.13%
• YTD: -62.23%
• 6M: -57.99%
• 1Y: -72.92%
• 3Y*: -48.40%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

DRLL

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: 31.26%
• 6M: 27.14%
• 1Y: 43.09%
• 3Y*: 14.67%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTID vs. DRLL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	-62.23%	-44.50%	-7.93%	-17.12%
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	31.26%	7.74%	0.02%	-2.59%

Correlation

The correlation between WTID and DRLL is -0.98, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.98
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.98
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 16, 2023	-0.98

The correlation between WTID and DRLL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.98 to -0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

WTID vs. DRLL - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WTID	DRLL
Energy	100.0%	99.1%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	0.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WTID vs. DRLL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTID

WTID Risk / Return Rank: 1
WTID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
WTID Omega Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
WTID Martin Ratio Rank: 1

DRLL

DRLL Risk / Return Rank: 55
DRLL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
DRLL Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
DRLL Omega Ratio Rank: 50
DRLL Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
DRLL Martin Ratio Rank: 52

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTID vs. DRLL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) and Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WTID	DRLL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	1.94	-3.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.24	2.49	-4.74
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.32	-0.55
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.94	3.11	-4.04
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.55	8.82	-10.37
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WTID vs. DRLL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTID Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the DRLL Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTID and DRLL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WTID	DRLL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.10	1.94	-3.04
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.61	0.57	-1.18

Drawdowns

WTID vs. DRLL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTID drawdown since its inception was -90.35%, which is greater than DRLL's maximum drawdown of -23.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTID and DRLL.

Drawdown Indicators

	WTID	DRLL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-90.35%	-23.73%	-66.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-78.12%	-13.93%	-64.19%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-88.99%	-23.73%	-65.26%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.87%	-8.10%	-80.77%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-54.44%	-8.02%	-46.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	47.10%	4.90%	+42.20%

Volatility

WTID vs. DRLL - Volatility Comparison

MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (WTID) has a higher volatility of 25.63% compared to Strive U.S. Energy ETF (DRLL) at 9.15%. This indicates that WTID's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DRLL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WTID	DRLL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	25.63%	9.15%	+16.48%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	53.59%	18.04%	+35.55%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	66.54%	22.34%	+44.20%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	70.34%	23.76%	+46.58%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	70.34%	23.76%	+46.58%

WTID vs. DRLL - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DRLL's 0.41% expense ratio.

Dividends

WTID vs. DRLL - Dividend Comparison

WTID has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DRLL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.33%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
DRLL Strive U.S. Energy ETF	2.33%	2.99%	3.00%	3.01%	1.18%
WTID MicroSectors Energy -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WTID and DRLL in my portfolio?

WTID and DRLL have a correlation of -0.98, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WTID or DRLL?

WTID has higher volatility (25.63%) compared to DRLL (9.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTID dropped -90.35% vs DRLL's -23.73%.

Which ETF is better, WTID or DRLL?

On 3-year performance, DRLL leads with 14.67% vs -48.40% for WTID. On fees, DRLL is cheaper at 0.41% per year. On volatility, DRLL has been the lower-risk option at 9.15%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WTID or DRLL?

Over the 3-year period, DRLL has performed better with a 14.67% return vs -48.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WTID or DRLL?

DRLL is cheaper with a 0.41% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for WTID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WTID or DRLL?

DRLL has the higher dividend yield at 2.33%, compared with 0.00% for WTID.

What is the main difference between WTID and DRLL?

WTID is categorized as Inverse Equities, while DRLL is Energy Equities. WTID tracks Solactive MicroSectors Energy Index - Benchmark TR Gross (--300%), while DRLL tracks Bloomberg US Energy Select Index. They also come from different issuers: REX and Strive. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for WTID and 0.41% for DRLL.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

DRLL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.