WTIBX vs. SSASX
WTIBX (Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund) and SSASX (State Street Income Fund) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. Over the past 5 years, WTIBX returned 0.79%/yr vs -0.64%/yr for SSASX. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. WTIBX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SSASX.
Performance
WTIBX vs. SSASX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WTIBX
- 1D
- 0.11%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- YTD
- 0.53%
- 6M
- 0.45%
- 1Y
- 5.99%
- 3Y*
- 4.67%
- 5Y*
- 0.79%
- 10Y*
- 2.26%
SSASX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- -0.00%
- 6M
- -0.08%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 2.95%
- 5Y*
- -0.64%
- 10Y*
- —
WTIBX vs. SSASX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WTIBX Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund | 0.53% | 7.38% | 1.99% | 7.47% | -13.13% | 1.30% |
SSASX State Street Income Fund | -0.00% | 7.49% | -0.95% | 4.83% | -13.74% | 0.59% |
Correlation
The correlation between WTIBX and SSASX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.91 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 25, 2021 | 0.96 |
The correlation between WTIBX and SSASX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WTIBX vs. SSASX — Risk / Return Rank
WTIBX
SSASX
WTIBX vs. SSASX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) and State Street Income Fund (SSASX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WTIBX | SSASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.02 | 1.50 | +0.52 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.26 | 4.51 | +1.75 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WTIBX | SSASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.57 | 1.22 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 | -0.10 | +0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.03 | -0.10 | +1.13 |
Drawdowns
WTIBX vs. SSASX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WTIBX drawdown since its inception was -17.72%, smaller than the maximum SSASX drawdown of -19.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTIBX and SSASX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WTIBX | SSASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.72% | -19.65% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.97% | -3.42% | +0.45% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.83% | -7.97% | +2.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.72% | -19.65% | +1.93% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -17.72% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.49% | -5.26% | +3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.95% | -9.68% | +7.73% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 1.14% | -0.18% |
Volatility
WTIBX vs. SSASX - Volatility Comparison
Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund (WTIBX) and State Street Income Fund (SSASX) have volatilities of 1.39% and 1.46%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WTIBX | SSASX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.39% | 1.46% | -0.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.75% | 2.96% | -0.21% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.85% | 4.22% | -0.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.64% | 6.49% | -0.85% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.67% | 6.49% | -1.82% |
WTIBX vs. SSASX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WTIBX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than SSASX's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
WTIBX vs. SSASX - Dividend Comparison
WTIBX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.14%, more than SSASX's 4.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SSASX State Street Income Fund | 4.00% | 4.01% | 2.76% | 2.86% | 2.48% | 3.77% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WTIBX Segall Bryant & Hamill Plus Bond Fund | 4.14% | 4.11% | 4.04% | 3.66% | 3.23% | 3.08% | 3.95% | 3.95% | 3.55% | 3.50% | 3.43% | 3.55% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.91, WTIBX and SSASX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
SSASX has higher volatility (1.46%) compared to WTIBX (1.39%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WTIBX dropped -17.72% vs SSASX's -19.65%.
WTIBX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.57 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WTIBX and SSASX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer