PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WTDM.DE vs. IJPA.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WTDM.DE vs. IJPA.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (WTDM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WTDM.DE is traded in EUR, while IJPA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IJPA.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WTDM.DE achieves a 7.70% return, which is significantly lower than IJPA.L's 17.01% return.


WTDM.DE

1D
0.05%
1M
3.49%
YTD
7.70%
6M
6.99%
1Y
18.24%
3Y*
13.36%
5Y*
12.75%
10Y*

IJPA.L

1D
-0.18%
1M
3.62%
YTD
17.01%
6M
17.09%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
15.54%
5Y*
9.87%
10Y*
9.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WTDM.DE vs. IJPA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WTDM.DE
WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc
7.70%0.91%24.87%14.95%-3.38%36.01%2.42%32.90%-2.38%11.34%
IJPA.L
iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc
17.01%12.18%13.65%15.76%-10.96%7.65%5.50%21.14%-10.12%10.37%

Correlation

The correlation between WTDM.DE and IJPA.L is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.45

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2016

0.55

The correlation between WTDM.DE and IJPA.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.45 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WTDM.DE vs. IJPA.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WTDM.DE
WTDM.DE Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
WTDM.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WTDM.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
WTDM.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
WTDM.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
WTDM.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

IJPA.L
IJPA.L Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 5555
Calmar Ratio Rank
IJPA.L Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WTDM.DE vs. IJPA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (WTDM.DE) and iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WTDM.DEIJPA.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.18

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.30

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.27

3.13

+0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.42

10.42

+1.00

WTDM.DE vs. IJPA.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WTDM.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the IJPA.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WTDM.DE and IJPA.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WTDM.DEIJPA.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.79

1.60

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

0.59

+0.34

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.89

0.53

+0.35

Drawdowns

WTDM.DE vs. IJPA.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WTDM.DE drawdown since its inception was -31.19%, which is greater than IJPA.L's maximum drawdown of -29.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WTDM.DE and IJPA.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WTDM.DEIJPA.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.19%

-29.22%

-1.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.48%

-9.63%

+4.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.57%

-15.54%

-5.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.57%

-19.21%

-1.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-29.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-0.18%

+0.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.83%

-6.52%

+2.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.57%

2.90%

-1.33%

Volatility

WTDM.DE vs. IJPA.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree US Quality Dividend Growth UCITS ETF - USD Acc (WTDM.DE) is 2.26%, while iShares Core MSCI Japan IMI UCITS ETF USD Acc (IJPA.L) has a volatility of 3.97%. This indicates that WTDM.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IJPA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WTDM.DEIJPA.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.26%

3.97%

-1.71%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.54%

15.55%

-9.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.97%

18.88%

-8.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.54%

16.82%

-3.28%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.96%

16.82%

-1.86%

WTDM.DE vs. IJPA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WTDM.DE has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than IJPA.L's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

WTDM.DE vs. IJPA.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WTDM.DE nor IJPA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WTDM.DE and IJPA.L have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, IJPA.L is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

IJPA.L is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for WTDM.DE.

WTDM.DE is categorized as Dividend, while IJPA.L is Japan Equities. WTDM.DE tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Dividend Growth Index, while IJPA.L tracks MSCI Japan Investable Market Index (IMI). They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for WTDM.DE and 0.12% for IJPA.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WTDM.DE and IJPA.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer