WSML.L vs. AGGH
WSML.L (iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and AGGH (Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WSML.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Small Cap Index, while AGGH is a Intermediate Core Bond fund actively managed by Simplify. WSML.L is passively managed, while AGGH is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WSML.L returned 16.81%/yr vs 4.99%/yr for AGGH. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WSML.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.33%/yr for AGGH.
Performance
WSML.L vs. AGGH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSML.L achieves a 14.98% return, which is significantly higher than AGGH's 0.70% return.
WSML.L
- 1D
- 2.86%
- 1M
- 2.45%
- YTD
- 14.98%
- 6M
- 14.98%
- 1Y
- 32.15%
- 3Y*
- 16.81%
- 5Y*
- 7.00%
- 10Y*
- —
AGGH
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 0.70%
- 6M
- 1.19%
- 1Y
- 8.76%
- 3Y*
- 4.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WSML.L vs. AGGH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WSML.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 14.98% | 19.95% | 7.38% | 17.11% | -12.97% |
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.70% | 8.23% | 1.97% | 8.47% | -8.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSML.L and AGGH is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 15, 2022 | 0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSML.L vs. AGGH — Risk / Return Rank
WSML.L
AGGH
WSML.L vs. AGGH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) and Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WSML.L | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.93 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.43 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.22 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.46 | 2.56 | +0.90 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.61 | 7.30 | +5.31 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WSML.L vs. AGGH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSML.L drawdown since its inception was -41.14%, which is greater than AGGH's maximum drawdown of -13.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSML.L and AGGH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSML.L | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -41.14% | -13.26% | -27.88% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.05% | -3.10% | -5.95% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.10% | -8.67% | -11.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.50% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.36% | +1.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.76% | -4.43% | -4.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.49% | 1.09% | +1.40% |
Volatility
WSML.L vs. AGGH - Volatility Comparison
iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WSML.L) has a higher volatility of 4.87% compared to Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF (AGGH) at 1.67%. This indicates that WSML.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGGH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSML.L | AGGH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.87% | 1.67% | +3.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 3.40% | +8.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.07% | 6.93% | +8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.55% | 8.44% | +10.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.58% | 8.44% | +11.14% |
WSML.L vs. AGGH - Expense Ratio Comparison
WSML.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than AGGH's 0.33% expense ratio.
Dividends
WSML.L vs. AGGH - Dividend Comparison
WSML.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while AGGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.51%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AGGH Simplify Aggregate Bond ETF | 7.51% | 7.54% | 8.97% | 9.51% | 2.11% |
WSML.L iShares MSCI World Small Cap UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WSML.L and AGGH have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AGGH is cheaper at 0.33% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AGGH is cheaper with a 0.33% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for WSML.L.
WSML.L is categorized as Global Equities, while AGGH is Intermediate Core Bond. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for WSML.L and 0.33% for AGGH.
Find the right allocation for WSML.L and AGGH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer