PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSM vs. WSC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WSM vs. WSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. (WSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 26.06% return, which is significantly lower than WSC's 50.30% return.


WSM

1D
2.19%
1M
29.92%
YTD
26.06%
6M
20.02%
1Y
46.51%
3Y*
53.75%
5Y*
23.70%
10Y*
27.10%

WSC

1D
2.63%
1M
8.95%
YTD
50.30%
6M
38.74%
1Y
2.61%
3Y*
-15.55%
5Y*
-0.59%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSM vs. WSC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
26.06%-2.09%86.56%80.24%-30.49%68.60%42.38%50.07%0.61%0.47%
WSC
WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp.
50.30%-43.07%-24.83%-1.48%10.60%76.26%25.31%96.28%-25.83%30.26%

Correlation

The correlation between WSM and WSC is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.48

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 30, 2017

0.38

The correlation between WSM and WSC shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.48 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WSM:

$26.80B

WSC:

$5.10B

EPS

WSM:

$8.93

WSC:

-$0.37

PS Ratio

WSM:

3.46

WSC:

2.26

PB Ratio

WSM:

14.33

WSC:

5.86

Total Revenue (TTM)

WSM:

$7.88B

WSC:

$2.27B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WSM:

$3.63B

WSC:

$1.10B

EBITDA (TTM)

WSM:

$1.49B

WSC:

$410.10M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSM vs. WSC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSM
WSM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
WSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
WSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

WSC
WSC Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
WSC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSC Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSC Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
WSC Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSC Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSM vs. WSC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. (WSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSMWSCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.59

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.06

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

0.05

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

0.09

+4.47

WSM vs. WSC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the WSC Sharpe Ratio of 0.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSM and WSC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSM vs. WSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than WSC's maximum drawdown of -71.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and WSC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSMWSCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.01%

-71.54%

-17.47%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.27%

-52.53%

+29.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.79%

-70.72%

+33.93%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.92%

-71.54%

+19.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.71%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-46.04%

+46.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.03%

-20.82%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.25%

30.16%

-19.91%

Volatility

WSM vs. WSC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) is 12.02%, while WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. (WSC) has a volatility of 13.36%. This indicates that WSM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WSC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSMWSCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.02%

13.36%

-1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.57%

38.60%

-13.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.63%

52.17%

-17.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.77%

41.18%

+3.59%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.26%

44.42%

-0.16%

Dividends

WSM vs. WSC - Dividend Comparison

WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, more than WSC's 1.00% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WSC
WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp.
1.00%1.49%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.23%1.43%1.16%1.72%2.65%1.43%1.93%2.55%3.33%2.98%3.02%2.36%

Financials

WSM vs. WSC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


500.00M1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B20222023202420252026
1.81B
548.63M
(WSM) Total Revenue
(WSC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WSM vs. WSC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%55.0%20222023202420252026
44.0%
52.1%
Portfolio components
WSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.

WSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. reported a gross profit of 285.68M and revenue of 548.63M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.1%.

WSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

WSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. reported an operating income of 96.66M and revenue of 548.63M, resulting in an operating margin of 17.6%.

WSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

WSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, WillScot Mobile Mini Holdings Corp. reported a net income of 28.12M and revenue of 548.63M, resulting in a net margin of 5.1%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WSM and WSC have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WSC has higher volatility (13.36%) compared to WSM (12.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSM dropped -89.01% vs WSC's -71.54%.

WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs 0.05), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSM and WSC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer