PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSM vs. NVO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WSM vs. NVO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSM achieves a 26.06% return, which is significantly higher than NVO's -10.74% return. Over the past 10 years, WSM has outperformed NVO with an annualized return of 27.10%, while NVO has yielded a comparatively lower 7.56% annualized return.


WSM

1D
2.19%
1M
29.92%
YTD
26.06%
6M
20.02%
1Y
46.51%
3Y*
53.75%
5Y*
23.70%
10Y*
27.10%

NVO

1D
-0.18%
1M
-6.80%
YTD
-10.74%
6M
-9.50%
1Y
-43.34%
3Y*
-15.59%
5Y*
2.92%
10Y*
7.56%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSM vs. NVO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
26.06%-2.09%86.56%80.24%-30.49%68.60%42.38%50.07%0.61%10.20%
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
-10.74%-39.22%-15.93%54.84%22.66%63.52%23.33%28.70%-12.98%52.92%

Correlation

The correlation between WSM and NVO is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.18

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.18

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WSM:

$26.80B

NVO:

$195.21B

EPS

WSM:

$8.93

NVO:

DKK 27.42

PE Ratio

WSM:

25.04

NVO:

10.34

PEG Ratio

WSM:

5.06

NVO:

0.44

PS Ratio

WSM:

3.46

NVO:

3.85

PB Ratio

WSM:

14.33

NVO:

6.21

Total Revenue (TTM)

WSM:

$7.88B

NVO:

DKK 327.80B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WSM:

$3.63B

NVO:

DKK 268.30B

EBITDA (TTM)

WSM:

$1.49B

NVO:

DKK 181.54B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSM vs. NVO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSM
WSM Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
WSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSM Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
WSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSM Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

NVO
NVO Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
NVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVO Omega Ratio Rank: 1010
Omega Ratio Rank
NVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSM vs. NVO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) and Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSMNVODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.11

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

0.85

+0.38

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.01

-0.80

+2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.55

-1.18

+5.73

WSM vs. NVO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.35, which is higher than the NVO Sharpe Ratio of -0.84. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSM and NVO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSM vs. NVO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSM drawdown since its inception was -89.01%, which is greater than NVO's maximum drawdown of -74.70%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSM and NVO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSMNVODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-89.01%

-74.70%

-14.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.27%

-54.34%

+31.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-36.79%

-74.70%

+37.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.92%

-74.70%

+22.78%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-59.71%

-74.70%

+14.99%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-68.11%

+68.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-25.03%

-17.79%

-7.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.25%

37.62%

-27.37%

Volatility

WSM vs. NVO - Volatility Comparison

Williams-Sonoma, Inc. (WSM) has a higher volatility of 12.02% compared to Novo Nordisk A/S (NVO) at 10.68%. This indicates that WSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NVO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSMNVODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.02%

10.68%

+1.34%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.57%

38.04%

-12.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.63%

51.88%

-17.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.77%

38.33%

+6.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.26%

32.56%

+11.70%

Dividends

WSM vs. NVO - Dividend Comparison

WSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.23%, less than NVO's 4.11% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
NVO
Novo Nordisk A/S
4.11%3.31%1.68%1.00%1.20%1.35%1.87%2.14%1.45%1.52%2.87%0.92%
WSM
Williams-Sonoma, Inc.
1.23%1.43%1.16%1.72%2.65%1.43%1.93%2.55%3.33%2.98%3.02%2.36%

Financials

WSM vs. NVO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00B40.00B60.00B80.00B100.00B20222023202420252026
1.81B
96.82B
(WSM) Total Revenue
(NVO) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WSM values in USD, NVO values in DKK

WSM vs. NVO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Williams-Sonoma, Inc. and Novo Nordisk A/S over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%80.0%90.0%20222023202420252026
44.0%
86.0%
Portfolio components
WSM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a gross profit of 793.43M and revenue of 1.81B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.0%.

NVO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a gross profit of 83.23B and revenue of 96.82B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 86.0%.

WSM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported an operating income of 291.69M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.

NVO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported an operating income of 59.62B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in an operating margin of 61.6%.

WSM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Williams-Sonoma, Inc. reported a net income of 231.36M and revenue of 1.81B, resulting in a net margin of 12.8%.

NVO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Novo Nordisk A/S reported a net income of 48.56B and revenue of 96.82B, resulting in a net margin of 50.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WSM and NVO have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WSM has higher volatility (12.02%) compared to NVO (10.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSM dropped -89.01% vs NVO's -74.70%.

WSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSM and NVO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer