PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSHR.NEO vs. MFT.TO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSHR.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR.NEO) and Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF (MFT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSHR.NEO achieves a 8.73% return, which is significantly higher than MFT.TO's 3.31% return.


WSHR.NEO

1D
0.82%
1M
1.98%
6M
5.76%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
10.11%
3Y*
9.70%
5Y*
5.89%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
7.83%

MFT.TO

1D
0.00%
1M
1.38%
6M
3.12%
YTD
3.31%
1Y
3.27%
3Y*
5.40%
5Y*
3.88%
10Y*
4.34%
ALL TIME*
4.36%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$59.55KCA$65.03KCA$75.29K
CA$492.20KCA$642.90KCA$601.04K

WSHR.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WSHR.NEO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF
8.73%5.34%12.31%11.88%-11.31%15.91%
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
3.31%0.81%8.84%11.99%-6.31%3.09%

Correlation

The correlation between WSHR.NEO and MFT.TO is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.13

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2021

0.14

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSHR.NEO vs. MFT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSHR.NEO
WSHR.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
WSHR.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

MFT.TO
MFT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
MFT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MFT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
MFT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
MFT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
MFT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSHR.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR.NEO) and Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF (MFT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WSHR.NEOMFT.TODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.32

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.23

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.14

2.48

-1.34

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.79

5.93

-2.14

WSHR.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSHR.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.95, which is comparable to the MFT.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSHR.NEO and MFT.TO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WSHR.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSHR.NEO drawdown since its inception was -21.74%, roughly equal to the maximum MFT.TO drawdown of -20.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSHR.NEO and MFT.TO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSHR.NEOMFT.TODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.74%

-20.87%

-0.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-1.33%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-3.40%

-7.75%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.74%

-7.45%

-14.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-20.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.26%

0.00%

-1.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.06%

-1.38%

-3.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.68%

0.55%

+2.13%

Volatility

WSHR.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR.NEO) has a higher volatility of 2.48% compared to Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF (MFT.TO) at 0.76%. This indicates that WSHR.NEO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MFT.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSHR.NEOMFT.TODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.48%

0.76%

+1.72%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.76%

1.88%

+5.88%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.76%

2.59%

+8.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.13%

3.72%

+7.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.03%

5.08%

+5.95%

Dividends

WSHR.NEO vs. MFT.TO - Dividend Comparison

WSHR.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than MFT.TO's 8.23% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
MFT.TO
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF
8.23%8.57%9.44%10.40%6.26%3.89%6.18%6.97%6.14%4.84%3.94%
WSHR.NEO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF
1.39%1.34%1.31%1.34%1.45%0.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSHR.NEO and MFT.TO have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WSHR.NEO is categorized as Global Equities, while MFT.TO is Corporate Bonds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSHR.NEO and MFT.TO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer