PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WSHR.NEO vs. SPUS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WSHR.NEO vs. SPUS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR.NEO) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WSHR.NEO is traded in CAD, while SPUS is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPUS values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WSHR.NEO achieves a 5.69% return, which is significantly lower than SPUS's 17.29% return.


WSHR.NEO

1D
0.21%
1M
4.06%
YTD
5.69%
6M
4.78%
1Y
8.03%
3Y*
9.31%
5Y*
6.96%
10Y*

SPUS

1D
-0.45%
1M
11.68%
YTD
17.29%
6M
14.76%
1Y
42.05%
3Y*
26.34%
5Y*
20.81%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WSHR.NEO vs. SPUS - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WSHR.NEO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF
5.69%5.34%12.31%11.88%-10.32%16.05%
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
17.29%14.28%37.36%31.29%-17.26%33.66%

Correlation

The correlation between WSHR.NEO and SPUS is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.32

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 13, 2021

0.53

Over the past year, the correlation between WSHR.NEO and SPUS has dropped to 0.32 - well below their long-term average of 0.53, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WSHR.NEO vs. SPUS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WSHR.NEO
WSHR.NEO Risk / Return Rank: 2121
Overall Rank
WSHR.NEO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
WSHR.NEO Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

SPUS
SPUS Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
SPUS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPUS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPUS Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
SPUS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPUS Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WSHR.NEO vs. SPUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR.NEO) and SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WSHR.NEOSPUSDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.30

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.55

-0.41

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.90

4.04

-3.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.00

14.54

-11.54

WSHR.NEO vs. SPUS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WSHR.NEO Sharpe Ratio is 0.73, which is lower than the SPUS Sharpe Ratio of 3.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WSHR.NEO and SPUS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WSHR.NEOSPUSDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

3.02

-2.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

1.19

-0.56

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

1.06

-0.36

Drawdowns

WSHR.NEO vs. SPUS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WSHR.NEO drawdown since its inception was -20.86%, smaller than the maximum SPUS drawdown of -25.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSHR.NEO and SPUS.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WSHR.NEOSPUSDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.86%

-25.06%

+4.20%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.96%

-10.46%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.15%

-23.45%

+12.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-20.86%

-25.06%

+4.20%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.19%

-0.45%

-0.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.81%

-5.58%

+0.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.69%

2.90%

-0.21%

Volatility

WSHR.NEO vs. SPUS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF (WSHR.NEO) is 2.27%, while SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF (SPUS) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that WSHR.NEO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SPUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WSHR.NEOSPUSDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

3.90%

-1.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.80%

10.73%

-2.93%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.10%

13.98%

-2.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.14%

17.57%

-6.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.11%

19.36%

-8.25%

WSHR.NEO vs. SPUS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WSHR.NEO has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SPUS's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

WSHR.NEO vs. SPUS - Dividend Comparison

WSHR.NEO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.32%, more than SPUS's 0.52% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SPUS
SP Funds S&P 500 Sharia Industry Exclusions ETF
0.52%0.60%0.70%0.87%1.21%1.15%1.04%
WSHR.NEO
Wealthsimple Shariah World Equity Index ETF
1.32%1.34%1.31%1.34%2.58%0.44%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WSHR.NEO and SPUS have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPUS is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPUS is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for WSHR.NEO.

WSHR.NEO is categorized as Global Equities, while SPUS is S&P 500. WSHR.NEO tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Quality and Low Volatility Index, while SPUS tracks S&P 500 Shariah Industry Exclusions Index. They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and SP Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for WSHR.NEO and 0.45% for SPUS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WSHR.NEO and SPUS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer