MFT.TO vs. CFRN.TO
MFT.TO (Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF) and CFRN.TO (CIBC Active Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF) are both Corporate Bonds funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, MFT.TO returned 3.71%/yr vs 3.42%/yr for CFRN.TO. At a 0.02 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
MFT.TO vs. CFRN.TO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, MFT.TO achieves a 2.53% return, which is significantly higher than CFRN.TO's 1.36% return.
MFT.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.67%
- 6M
- 2.08%
- YTD
- 2.53%
- 1Y
- 2.43%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- 3.71%
- 10Y*
- 4.41%
CFRN.TO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 0.20%
- 6M
- 1.31%
- YTD
- 1.36%
- 1Y
- 3.11%
- 3Y*
- 4.22%
- 5Y*
- 3.42%
- 10Y*
- —
MFT.TO vs. CFRN.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
MFT.TO Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF | 2.53% | 0.81% | 8.84% | 11.99% | -6.31% | 5.56% | -0.64% | 4.02% |
CFRN.TO CIBC Active Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF | 1.36% | 3.32% | 5.21% | 5.83% | 1.40% | 0.25% | 1.04% | 1.97% |
Correlation
The correlation between MFT.TO and CFRN.TO is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 16, 2019 | 0.02 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
MFT.TO vs. CFRN.TO — Risk / Return Rank
MFT.TO
CFRN.TO
MFT.TO vs. CFRN.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF (MFT.TO) and CIBC Active Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF (CFRN.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| MFT.TO | CFRN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.40 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.30 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.16 | 1.57 | -0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.84 | 6.91 | -5.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.39 | 33.05 | -28.66 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
MFT.TO vs. CFRN.TO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum MFT.TO drawdown since its inception was -20.87%, which is greater than CFRN.TO's maximum drawdown of -1.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for MFT.TO and CFRN.TO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| MFT.TO | CFRN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.87% | -1.00% | -19.87% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.33% | -0.45% | -0.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.40% | -0.66% | -2.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -7.45% | -1.00% | -6.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -20.87% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.38% | -0.15% | -1.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.55% | 0.09% | +0.46% |
Volatility
MFT.TO vs. CFRN.TO - Volatility Comparison
Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF (MFT.TO) has a higher volatility of 0.79% compared to CIBC Active Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF (CFRN.TO) at 0.21%. This indicates that MFT.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CFRN.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| MFT.TO | CFRN.TO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.79% | 0.21% | +0.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 1.80% | 0.83% | +0.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.61% | 1.34% | +1.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.71% | 2.10% | +1.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.10% | 1.78% | +3.32% |
Dividends
MFT.TO vs. CFRN.TO - Dividend Comparison
MFT.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.29%, more than CFRN.TO's 3.17% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CFRN.TO CIBC Active Investment Grade Floating Rate Bond ETF | 3.17% | 3.47% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 2.26% | 1.26% | 1.74% | 1.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MFT.TO Mackenzie Floating Rate Income ETF | 8.29% | 8.57% | 9.44% | 10.40% | 6.26% | 3.89% | 6.18% | 6.97% | 6.14% | 4.84% | 3.94% |
Frequently Asked Questions
MFT.TO and CFRN.TO have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
They also come from different issuers: Mackenzie and CIBC.
Find the right allocation for MFT.TO and CFRN.TO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer