WSCVX vs. PCSVX
WSCVX (Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund) and PCSVX (PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments) are both Small Cap Value Equities funds. Over the past year, WSCVX returned 46.03% vs 27.50% for PCSVX. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WSCVX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.02%/yr for PCSVX.
Performance
WSCVX vs. PCSVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WSCVX achieves a 22.71% return, which is significantly higher than PCSVX's 14.05% return.
WSCVX
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 3.98%
- YTD
- 22.71%
- 6M
- 22.92%
- 1Y
- 46.03%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PCSVX
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- 3.83%
- YTD
- 14.05%
- 6M
- 14.28%
- 1Y
- 27.50%
- 3Y*
- 12.65%
- 5Y*
- 4.31%
- 10Y*
- 8.57%
WSCVX vs. PCSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WSCVX Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund | 22.71% | 13.80% | 29.11% | 7.98% |
PCSVX PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments | 14.05% | 4.33% | 6.24% | 9.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between WSCVX and PCSVX is 0.77, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2023 | 0.83 |
The correlation between WSCVX and PCSVX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WSCVX vs. PCSVX — Risk / Return Rank
WSCVX
PCSVX
WSCVX vs. PCSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund (WSCVX) and PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WSCVX | PCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.84 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.47 | 1.33 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.45 | 3.32 | +2.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.86 | 9.99 | +7.87 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WSCVX | PCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.79 | 1.94 | +0.84 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.20 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 0.38 | +0.88 |
Drawdowns
WSCVX vs. PCSVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WSCVX drawdown since its inception was -22.34%, smaller than the maximum PCSVX drawdown of -62.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WSCVX and PCSVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WSCVX | PCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.34% | -62.95% | +40.61% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.96% | -9.67% | +0.71% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -34.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.96% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -46.65% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -3.16% | +3.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.27% | -10.58% | +6.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.73% | 3.20% | -0.47% |
Volatility
WSCVX vs. PCSVX - Volatility Comparison
Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund (WSCVX) has a higher volatility of 5.42% compared to PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments (PCSVX) at 4.57%. This indicates that WSCVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PCSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WSCVX | PCSVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.42% | 4.57% | +0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.65% | 11.67% | -0.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.55% | 16.54% | +1.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 22.36% | -0.27% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 22.99% | -0.90% |
WSCVX vs. PCSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WSCVX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than PCSVX's 1.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
WSCVX vs. PCSVX - Dividend Comparison
WSCVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.78%, more than PCSVX's 3.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PCSVX PACE Small/Medium Co Value Equity Investments | 3.11% | 3.54% | 18.45% | 0.69% | 22.49% | 16.23% | 0.61% | 0.83% | 7.14% | 11.82% | 2.62% | 11.87% |
WSCVX Walthausen Small Cap Value Fund | 10.78% | 13.23% | 28.71% | 9.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WSCVX and PCSVX have a correlation of 0.77, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WSCVX has higher volatility (5.42%) compared to PCSVX (4.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WSCVX dropped -22.34% vs PCSVX's -62.95%.
WSCVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.79 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WSCVX and PCSVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer