WS vs. AZO
WS (Worthington Steel Inc) and AZO (AutoZone, Inc.) are both stocks. WS operates in Steel (Basic Materials), while AZO operates in Specialty Retail (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past year, WS returned 1.64% vs -16.91% for AZO. At a 0.08 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WS vs. AZO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WS achieves a -4.44% return, which is significantly higher than AZO's -9.21% return.
WS
- 1D
- -0.76%
- 1M
- -24.51%
- 6M
- -10.44%
- YTD
- -4.44%
- 1Y
- 1.64%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AZO
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -1.20%
- 6M
- -12.60%
- YTD
- -9.21%
- 1Y
- -16.91%
- 3Y*
- 6.39%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 14.44%
WS vs. AZO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
WS Worthington Steel Inc | -4.44% | 11.18% | 15.44% | 16.60% |
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | -9.21% | 5.92% | 23.84% | -0.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between WS and AZO is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 1, 2023 | 0.08 |
Fundamentals
WS:
$1.67B
AZO:
$50.27B
WS:
$0.33
AZO:
$145.27
WS:
100.06
AZO:
21.20
WS:
0.47
AZO:
2.63
WS:
$3.44B
AZO:
$19.99B
WS:
$402.60M
AZO:
$10.34B
WS:
$175.70M
AZO:
$4.26B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WS vs. AZO — Risk / Return Rank
WS
AZO
WS vs. AZO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worthington Steel Inc (WS) and AutoZone, Inc. (AZO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WS | AZO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.63 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.03 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 0.92 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.04 | -0.52 | +0.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.10 | -0.97 | +1.07 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WS vs. AZO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WS drawdown since its inception was -50.98%, which is greater than AZO's maximum drawdown of -46.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WS and AZO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WS | AZO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -50.98% | -46.32% | -4.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.00% | -32.59% | -9.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -32.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -32.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -42.14% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -32.05% | -29.29% | -2.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.91% | -10.92% | -10.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.18% | 17.44% | -1.26% |
Volatility
WS vs. AZO - Volatility Comparison
Worthington Steel Inc (WS) has a higher volatility of 17.18% compared to AutoZone, Inc. (AZO) at 10.92%. This indicates that WS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AZO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WS | AZO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.18% | 10.92% | +6.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 38.43% | 23.61% | +14.82% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 46.64% | 28.37% | +18.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.53% | 24.81% | +27.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.53% | 26.67% | +25.86% |
Dividends
WS vs. AZO - Dividend Comparison
WS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, while AZO has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
AZO AutoZone, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WS Worthington Steel Inc | 1.95% | 1.85% | 2.01% |
Financials
WS vs. AZO - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Worthington Steel Inc and AutoZone, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WS vs. AZO - Profitability Comparison
WS - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported a gross profit of 118.10M and revenue of 929.20M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.7%.
AZO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.52B and revenue of 4.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 52.2%.
WS - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported an operating income of -53.70M and revenue of 929.20M, resulting in an operating margin of -5.8%.
AZO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported an operating income of 923.76M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 19.1%.
WS - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Worthington Steel Inc reported a net income of -49.20M and revenue of 929.20M, resulting in a net margin of -5.3%.
AZO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, AutoZone, Inc. reported a net income of 641.49M and revenue of 4.84B, resulting in a net margin of 13.3%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WS and AZO have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WS has higher volatility (17.18%) compared to AZO (10.92%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WS dropped -50.98% vs AZO's -46.32%.
WS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.04 vs -0.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WS and AZO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer