PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRTH vs. GRNI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WRTH vs. GRNI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Worth Charting Options Income ETF (WRTH) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WRTH

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.48%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

GRNI

1D
1.68%
1M
1.07%
6M
10.10%
YTD
10.53%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$745.14K$669.94K$736.31K
$1.43M$1.25M$1.45M

WRTH vs. GRNI - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WRTH and GRNI is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 28, 2026

-0.20

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRTH vs. GRNI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worth Charting Options Income ETF (WRTH) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap & Income ETF (GRNI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WRTH vs. GRNI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WRTH vs. GRNI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRTH drawdown since its inception was -6.20%, smaller than the maximum GRNI drawdown of -9.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRTH and GRNI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRTHGRNIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-6.20%

-9.55%

+3.35%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.76%

0.00%

-4.76%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.93%

-2.02%

+0.09%

Volatility

WRTH vs. GRNI - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRTHGRNIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.81%

16.95%

-0.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.81%

16.95%

-0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.81%

16.95%

-0.14%

WRTH vs. GRNI - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRTH has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than GRNI's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

WRTH vs. GRNI - Dividend Comparison

WRTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than GRNI's 6.46% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


WRTH and GRNI have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, GRNI is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

GRNI is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for WRTH.

GRNI has the higher dividend yield at 6.46%, compared with 1.61% for WRTH.

Their fees differ too: 1.02% for WRTH and 0.99% for GRNI.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRTH and GRNI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer