PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRNW.DE vs. ICLN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WRNW.DE vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WRNW.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WRNW.DE is traded in EUR, while ICLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRNW.DE achieves a 30.17% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 32.31% return.


WRNW.DE

1D
-2.37%
1M
3.73%
YTD
30.17%
6M
29.38%
1Y
107.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ICLN

1D
-6.97%
1M
1.97%
YTD
32.31%
6M
28.70%
1Y
67.86%
3Y*
3.57%
5Y*
1.58%
10Y*
10.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRNW.DE vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WRNW.DE
WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc
30.17%51.49%-23.68%-12.62%
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
32.31%29.60%-20.81%-18.20%

Correlation

The correlation between WRNW.DE and ICLN is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.67

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023

0.65

The correlation between WRNW.DE and ICLN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRNW.DE vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRNW.DE
WRNW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
WRNW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

ICLN
ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRNW.DE vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WRNW.DE) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WRNW.DEICLNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.96

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.85

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.41

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.07

5.34

+1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.97

16.25

+7.71

WRNW.DE vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRNW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 2.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRNW.DE and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WRNW.DEICLNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

2.58

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

-0.04

+0.41

Drawdowns

WRNW.DE vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRNW.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.14%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -84.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRNW.DE and ICLN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRNW.DEICLNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.14%

-84.40%

+35.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.04%

-12.78%

-2.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-43.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-57.06%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-62.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-27.17%

+23.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-58.03%

+37.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

4.19%

+0.25%

Volatility

WRNW.DE vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WRNW.DE) is 10.28%, while iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) has a volatility of 11.72%. This indicates that WRNW.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ICLN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRNW.DEICLNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.28%

11.72%

-1.44%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.33%

20.80%

-1.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.01%

26.41%

+3.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.02%

25.88%

+0.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.02%

26.52%

-0.50%

WRNW.DE vs. ICLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRNW.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ICLN's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

WRNW.DE vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

WRNW.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.26%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ICLN
iShares Global Clean Energy ETF
1.26%1.63%1.85%1.59%0.89%1.18%0.34%1.36%2.77%2.49%3.88%2.36%
WRNW.DE
WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


WRNW.DE and ICLN have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ICLN is cheaper at 0.39% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ICLN is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WRNW.DE.

WRNW.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while ICLN is Alternative Energy Equities. WRNW.DE tracks WisdomTree Renewable Energy, while ICLN tracks S&P Global Clean Energy Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WRNW.DE and 0.39% for ICLN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRNW.DE and ICLN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer