PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRNW.DE vs. ESIH.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WRNW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WRNW.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WRNW.DE is traded in EUR, while ESIH.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the ESIH.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRNW.DE achieves a 30.17% return, which is significantly higher than ESIH.L's -1.85% return.


WRNW.DE

1D
-2.37%
1M
3.73%
YTD
30.17%
6M
29.38%
1Y
107.60%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ESIH.L

1D
2.97%
1M
1.59%
YTD
-1.85%
6M
-0.51%
1Y
6.04%
3Y*
2.67%
5Y*
5.75%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRNW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WRNW.DE
WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc
30.17%51.49%-23.68%-12.62%
ESIH.L
iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF
-1.83%6.88%4.34%0.06%

Correlation

The correlation between WRNW.DE and ESIH.L is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2023

0.19

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRNW.DE vs. ESIH.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRNW.DE
WRNW.DE Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
WRNW.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRNW.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank

ESIH.L
ESIH.L Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
ESIH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRNW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WRNW.DE) and iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WRNW.DEESIH.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+3.18

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+3.39

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.52

1.08

+0.44

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.07

0.47

+6.60

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.97

1.04

+22.93

WRNW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRNW.DE Sharpe Ratio is 3.54, which is higher than the ESIH.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRNW.DE and ESIH.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WRNW.DEESIH.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.54

0.36

+3.18

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.42

-0.05

Drawdowns

WRNW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRNW.DE drawdown since its inception was -49.14%, which is greater than ESIH.L's maximum drawdown of -25.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRNW.DE and ESIH.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRNW.DEESIH.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-49.14%

-25.54%

-23.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.04%

-12.93%

-2.11%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.04%

-11.03%

+6.99%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.88%

-7.22%

-13.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.44%

5.81%

-1.37%

Volatility

WRNW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree Renewable Energy UCITS ETF USD Unhedged Acc (WRNW.DE) has a higher volatility of 10.28% compared to iShares MSCI Europe Health Care Sector UCITS ETF (ESIH.L) at 5.28%. This indicates that WRNW.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ESIH.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRNW.DEESIH.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.28%

5.28%

+5.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.33%

11.85%

+7.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.01%

16.89%

+13.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.02%

15.72%

+10.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.02%

15.50%

+10.52%

WRNW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRNW.DE has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ESIH.L's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

WRNW.DE vs. ESIH.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither WRNW.DE nor ESIH.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WRNW.DE and ESIH.L have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ESIH.L is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ESIH.L is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for WRNW.DE.

WRNW.DE is categorized as Energy Equities, while ESIH.L is Health & Biotech Equities. WRNW.DE tracks WisdomTree Renewable Energy, while ESIH.L tracks MSCI World/Health Care NR USD. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WRNW.DE and 0.18% for ESIH.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRNW.DE and ESIH.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer