WRND vs. WLDR

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

WRND (IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF) and WLDR (Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF) are both Global Equities funds - WRND tracks the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Net while WLDR tracks the Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WRND returned 20.25%/yr vs 32.50%/yr for WLDR. A 0.76 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WRND charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.67%/yr for WLDR.

Performance

WRND vs. WLDR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRND achieves a 10.19% return, which is significantly lower than WLDR's 32.24% return.

WRND

• 1D: -0.26%
• 1M: -4.26%
• YTD: 10.19%
• 6M: 9.65%
• 1Y: 28.80%
• 3Y*: 20.25%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

WLDR

• 1D: 2.09%
• 1M: 5.84%
• YTD: 32.24%
• 6M: 31.44%
• 1Y: 57.08%
• 3Y*: 32.50%
• 5Y*: 18.98%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRND vs. WLDR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF	10.19%	27.72%	13.46%	34.85%	-19.17%
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	32.24%	31.24%	22.74%	18.93%	-9.25%

Correlation

The correlation between WRND and WLDR is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.68
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.71
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022	0.76

The correlation between WRND and WLDR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

WRND vs. WLDR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WRND	WLDR
Technology	52.8%	37.0%
Industrials	12.9%	8.1%
Communication Services	12.4%	10.1%
Healthcare	11.3%	8.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.3%	5.9%
Consumer Defensive	1.4%	7.9%
Basic Materials	0.9%	3.1%
Energy	-	3.8%
Financial Services	-	12.2%
Real Estate	-	1.6%
Utilities	-	2.4%

Return for Risk

WRND vs. WLDR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRND

WRND Risk / Return Rank: 53
WRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
WRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
WRND Omega Ratio Rank: 50
WRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 54
WRND Martin Ratio Rank: 59

WLDR

WLDR Risk / Return Rank: 95
WLDR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
WLDR Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
WLDR Omega Ratio Rank: 94
WLDR Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
WLDR Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRND vs. WLDR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WRND	WLDR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.61	3.53	-1.91
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	4.61	-2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.28	1.59	-0.31
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	6.47	-4.15
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.36	25.07	-15.71

WRND vs. WLDR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRND Sharpe Ratio is 1.61, which is lower than the WLDR Sharpe Ratio of 3.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRND and WLDR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WRND vs. WLDR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRND drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, smaller than the maximum WLDR drawdown of -44.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRND and WLDR.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRND	WLDR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.16%	-44.69%	+17.53%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-8.86%	-3.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.41%	-20.30%	+1.89%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-23.77%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.84%	-0.49%	-5.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.94%	-8.58%	+2.64%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.08%	2.28%	+0.80%

Volatility

WRND vs. WLDR - Volatility Comparison

IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF (WLDR) have volatilities of 7.32% and 7.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRND	WLDR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.32%	7.56%	-0.24%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.87%	13.39%	+1.48%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.95%	16.27%	+1.68%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.96%	17.41%	+1.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.96%	21.00%	-2.04%

WRND vs. WLDR - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than WLDR's 0.67% expense ratio.

Dividends

WRND vs. WLDR - Dividend Comparison

WRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, less than WLDR's 7.03% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
WLDR Affinity World Leaders Equity ETF	7.03%	9.01%	13.99%	2.28%	2.10%	7.55%	1.80%	2.48%	2.82%
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF	1.04%	1.29%	1.15%	2.06%	2.06%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRND and WLDR in my portfolio?

WRND and WLDR have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WRND or WLDR?

WLDR has higher volatility (7.56%) compared to WRND (7.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRND dropped -27.16% vs WLDR's -44.69%.

Which ETF is better, WRND or WLDR?

On 3-year performance, WLDR leads with 32.50% vs 20.25% for WRND. On fees, WRND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, WRND has been the lower-risk option at 7.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WRND or WLDR?

Over the 3-year period, WLDR has performed better with a 32.50% return vs 20.25%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WRND or WLDR?

WRND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.67% for WLDR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WRND or WLDR?

WLDR has the higher dividend yield at 7.03%, compared with 1.04% for WRND.

What is the main difference between WRND and WLDR?

WRND tracks IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Net, while WLDR tracks Thomson Reuters StarMine Affinity World Leaders Index. They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Regents Park Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WRND and 0.67% for WLDR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WLDR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.53 vs 1.61), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.