WRND vs. MMCA

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

WRND (IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF) and MMCA (IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WRND is a Global Equities fund tracking the IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders Index - Benchmark TR Net, while MMCA is a Municipal Bonds fund actively managed by IndexIQ. WRND is passively managed, while MMCA is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, WRND returned 22.64%/yr vs 4.06%/yr for MMCA. At a 0.20 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WRND charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MMCA.

Performance

WRND vs. MMCA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRND achieves a 16.08% return, which is significantly higher than MMCA's 0.66% return.

WRND

• 1D: -0.80%
• 1M: 5.16%
• YTD: 16.08%
• 6M: 16.09%
• 1Y: 39.52%
• 3Y*: 22.64%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MMCA

• 1D: -0.05%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 0.66%
• 6M: 1.02%
• 1Y: 6.39%
• 3Y*: 4.06%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRND vs. MMCA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF	16.08%	27.72%	13.46%	34.85%	-19.17%
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF	0.66%	5.74%	1.70%	5.77%	-9.70%

Correlation

The correlation between WRND and MMCA is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.30
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 9, 2022	0.20

The correlation between WRND and MMCA shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (3 years) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WRND vs. MMCA - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	WRND	MMCA
Technology	49.9%	-
Industrials	14.0%	-
Communication Services	13.2%	-
Healthcare	11.7%	-
Consumer Cyclical	8.7%	-
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	-
Basic Materials	1.0%	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	0.8%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

WRND vs. MMCA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRND

WRND Risk / Return Rank: 69
WRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
WRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
WRND Omega Ratio Rank: 67
WRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
WRND Martin Ratio Rank: 72

MMCA

MMCA Risk / Return Rank: 66
MMCA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
MMCA Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
MMCA Omega Ratio Rank: 85
MMCA Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MMCA Martin Ratio Rank: 42

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRND vs. MMCA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WRND	MMCA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.36	2.47	-0.11
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.19	3.69	-0.50
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.52	-0.12
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.19	2.13	+1.06
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.52	6.78	+6.74
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WRND vs. MMCA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRND Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the MMCA Sharpe Ratio of 2.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRND and MMCA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WRND	MMCA	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.36	2.47	-0.11
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.81	0.04	+0.77

Drawdowns

WRND vs. MMCA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRND drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, which is greater than MMCA's maximum drawdown of -15.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRND and MMCA.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRND	MMCA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.16%	-15.97%	-11.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.43%	-3.01%	-9.42%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.41%	-3.68%	-14.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.80%	-1.53%	+0.73%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.97%	-7.05%	+1.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.93%	0.94%	+1.99%

Volatility

WRND vs. MMCA - Volatility Comparison

IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF (MMCA) at 0.90%. This indicates that WRND's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MMCA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRND	MMCA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	0.90%	+3.87%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.45%	1.89%	+11.56%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.81%	2.60%	+14.21%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.79%	3.61%	+15.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.79%	3.61%	+15.18%

WRND vs. MMCA - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than MMCA's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

WRND vs. MMCA - Dividend Comparison

WRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than MMCA's 3.29% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
MMCA IQ MacKay California Municipal Intermediate ETF	3.29%	3.39%	3.66%	3.57%	2.90%	0.05%
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF	0.99%	1.29%	1.15%	2.06%	2.06%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRND and MMCA in my portfolio?

WRND and MMCA have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WRND or MMCA?

WRND has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to MMCA (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRND dropped -27.16% vs MMCA's -15.97%.

Which ETF is better, WRND or MMCA?

On 3-year performance, WRND leads with 22.64% vs 4.06% for MMCA. On fees, WRND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. On volatility, MMCA has been the lower-risk option at 0.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WRND or MMCA?

Over the 3-year period, WRND has performed better with a 22.64% return vs 4.06%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WRND or MMCA?

WRND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for MMCA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WRND or MMCA?

MMCA has the higher dividend yield at 3.29%, compared with 0.99% for WRND.

What is the main difference between WRND and MMCA?

WRND is categorized as Global Equities, while MMCA is Municipal Bonds. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WRND and 0.36% for MMCA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MMCA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.47 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.