PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRND vs. FWD
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

WRND vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

WRND vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
WRND
IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
-3.11%27.72%13.46%21.81%
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
3.97%32.00%29.23%25.66%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRND achieves a -3.11% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 3.97% return.


WRND

1D
4.07%
1M
-6.90%
YTD
-3.11%
6M
-0.04%
1Y
22.97%
3Y*
17.80%
5Y*
10Y*

FWD

1D
5.03%
1M
-7.40%
YTD
3.97%
6M
7.40%
1Y
54.36%
3Y*
28.49%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


WRND vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

WRND vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRND
WRND Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
WRND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRND Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
WRND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRND Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank

FWD
FWD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRND vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WRNDFWDDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.12

1.89

-0.77

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.67

2.51

-0.84

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.36

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.75

3.94

-2.19

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.86

13.30

-6.44

WRND vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRND Sharpe Ratio is 1.12, which is lower than the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRND and FWD, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WRNDFWDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.12

1.89

-0.77

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

1.24

-0.66

Correlation

The correlation between WRND and FWD is 0.84, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

WRND vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

WRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, more than FWD's 0.11% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
WRND
IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF
1.18%1.29%1.15%2.06%2.06%
FWD
AB Disruptors ETF
0.11%0.11%1.89%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

WRND vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRND drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, smaller than the maximum FWD drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRND and FWD.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


WRNDFWDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.16%

-29.02%

+1.86%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.75%

-13.50%

+0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.87%

-8.65%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.16%

-4.23%

-1.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.26%

4.00%

-0.74%

Volatility

WRND vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) is 8.10%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 11.26%. This indicates that WRND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


WRNDFWDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.10%

11.26%

-3.16%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.20%

19.48%

-6.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.59%

28.86%

-8.27%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.78%

24.63%

-5.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.78%

24.63%

-5.85%