WRND vs. AVTM
WRND (IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF) and AVTM (Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF) are both Global Equities funds. WRND is passively managed, while AVTM is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WRND charges 0.18%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for AVTM.
Performance
WRND vs. AVTM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WRND
- 1D
- -0.80%
- 1M
- 5.16%
- YTD
- 16.08%
- 6M
- 16.09%
- 1Y
- 39.52%
- 3Y*
- 22.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
AVTM
- 1D
- -0.65%
- 1M
- 5.45%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRND vs. AVTM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF | 10.46% |
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 9.06% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRND and AVTM is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2026 | 0.94 |
WRND vs. AVTM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
WRND
AVTM
Technology
Industrials
Communication Services
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
WRND
AVTM
Industrials
WRND
AVTM
Communication Services
WRND
AVTM
Healthcare
WRND
AVTM
Consumer Cyclical
WRND
AVTM
Consumer Defensive
WRND
AVTM
Basic Materials
WRND
AVTM
Energy
WRND
-
AVTM
Financial Services
WRND
-
AVTM
Real Estate
WRND
-
AVTM
Utilities
WRND
-
AVTM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRND vs. AVTM — Risk / Return Rank
WRND
AVTM
WRND vs. AVTM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF (WRND) and Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF (AVTM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WRND | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.19 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WRND | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.36 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.81 | 1.88 | -1.08 |
Drawdowns
WRND vs. AVTM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRND drawdown since its inception was -27.16%, which is greater than AVTM's maximum drawdown of -9.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRND and AVTM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRND | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.16% | -9.21% | -17.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.43% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.41% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.80% | -0.65% | -0.15% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.97% | -2.08% | -3.89% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.93% | — | — |
Volatility
WRND vs. AVTM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRND | AVTM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.77% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.45% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.81% | 15.88% | +0.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 15.88% | +2.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 15.88% | +2.91% |
WRND vs. AVTM - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRND has a 0.18% expense ratio, which is lower than AVTM's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
WRND vs. AVTM - Dividend Comparison
WRND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, more than AVTM's 0.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AVTM Avantis Total Equity Markets ETF | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WRND IQ Global Equity R&D Leaders ETF | 0.99% | 1.29% | 1.15% | 2.06% | 2.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, WRND and AVTM move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, WRND is cheaper at 0.18% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WRND is cheaper with a 0.18% expense ratio, compared with 0.22% for AVTM.
WRND has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.08% for AVTM.
They also come from different issuers: IndexIQ and Avantis. Their fees differ too: 0.18% for WRND and 0.22% for AVTM.
Find the right allocation for WRND and AVTM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer