WRDLY vs. SHAZ

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

WRDLY (Worldline SA) and SHAZ (SharonAI Holdings Inc) are both stocks. Both are in the Technology sector — WRDLY in Software - Infrastructure, SHAZ in Information Technology Services. Over the past 3 years, WRDLY returned 191.94%/yr vs 88.17%/yr for SHAZ. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions.

Performance

WRDLY vs. SHAZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Worldline SA (WRDLY) and SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRDLY achieves a 53,099.51% return, which is significantly higher than SHAZ's 3,717.84% return.

WRDLY

• 1D: -0.85%
• 1M: 2,791.74%
• 6M: 55,679.07%
• YTD: 53,099.51%
• 1Y: 23,130.02%
• 3Y*: 191.94%
• 5Y*: 58.24%
• 10Y*: —

SHAZ

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 0.60%
• 6M: 3,717.84%
• YTD: 3,717.84%
• 1Y: 46,986.67%
• 3Y*: 88.17%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRDLY vs. SHAZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WRDLY Worldline SA	53,099.51%	-78.78%	-50.84%	-55.64%	-30.39%	1.30%
SHAZ SharonAI Holdings Inc	3,717.84%	6,066.67%	-99.73%	6.31%	3.88%	1.48%

Correlation

The correlation between WRDLY and SHAZ is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.09
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	-0.06
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 27, 2021	-0.03

Fundamentals

Market Cap WRDLY : $83.42M SHAZ : $691.57M
EPS WRDLY : -€9.73 SHAZ : -$3.47
PS Ratio WRDLY : 0.33 SHAZ : 770.86
PB Ratio WRDLY : 0.88 SHAZ : 11.10
Total Revenue (TTM) WRDLY : €8.65B SHAZ : $1.54M
Gross Profit (TTM) WRDLY : €4.77B SHAZ : -$1.46M
EBITDA (TTM) WRDLY : €1.07B SHAZ : -$40.42M

Return for Risk

WRDLY vs. SHAZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRDLY

WRDLY Risk / Return Rank: 100
WRDLY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 99
WRDLY Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
WRDLY Omega Ratio Rank: 100
WRDLY Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
WRDLY Martin Ratio Rank: 100

SHAZ

SHAZ Risk / Return Rank: 100
SHAZ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Omega Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
SHAZ Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRDLY vs. SHAZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worldline SA (WRDLY) and SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WRDLY	SHAZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	4.38	44.79	-40.40
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	70.72	35.82	+34.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	11.99	7.60	+4.39
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	271.69	1,736.54	-1,464.84
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	481.13	4,209.10	-3,727.98

WRDLY vs. SHAZ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRDLY Sharpe Ratio is 4.38, which is lower than the SHAZ Sharpe Ratio of 44.79. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRDLY and SHAZ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WRDLY vs. SHAZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRDLY drawdown since its inception was -99.40%, roughly equal to the maximum SHAZ drawdown of -99.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRDLY and SHAZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	WRDLY	SHAZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.40%	-99.78%	+0.38%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-87.01%	-44.73%	-42.28%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-98.48%	-99.78%	+1.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-99.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.44%	-23.81%	+16.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-59.92%	-35.39%	-24.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	49.04%	17.75%	+31.29%

Volatility

WRDLY vs. SHAZ - Volatility Comparison

Worldline SA (WRDLY) has a higher volatility of 316.85% compared to SharonAI Holdings Inc (SHAZ) at 37.99%. This indicates that WRDLY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SHAZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WRDLY	SHAZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	316.85%	37.99%	+278.86%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	525.02%	294.14%	+230.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	5,392.04%	1,734.37%	+3,657.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	2,420.83%	1,799.63%	+621.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	2,176.29%	1,799.63%	+376.66%

Dividends

WRDLY vs. SHAZ - Dividend Comparison

WRDLY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.92%, while SHAZ has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM
SHAZ SharonAI Holdings Inc	0.00%
WRDLY Worldline SA	6.92%

Financials

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WRDLY and SHAZ in my portfolio?

WRDLY and SHAZ have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WRDLY or SHAZ?

WRDLY has higher volatility (316.85%) compared to SHAZ (37.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRDLY dropped -99.40% vs SHAZ's -99.78%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SHAZ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (44.79 vs 4.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.