WRDA.L vs. UD08.L
WRDA.L (UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc) and UD08.L (UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc) are both exchange-traded funds - WRDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the MSCI World Index, while UD08.L is a Commodities fund tracking the UBS CMCI Ex-Agriculture Ex-Livestock Capped (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WRDA.L returned 27.48% vs 43.63% for UD08.L. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. WRDA.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for UD08.L.
Performance
WRDA.L vs. UD08.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WRDA.L achieves a 10.09% return, which is significantly lower than UD08.L's 25.78% return.
WRDA.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 5.30%
- YTD
- 10.09%
- 6M
- 10.62%
- 1Y
- 27.48%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UD08.L
- 1D
- -0.14%
- 1M
- 1.53%
- YTD
- 25.78%
- 6M
- 28.13%
- 1Y
- 43.63%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WRDA.L vs. UD08.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | 10.09% | 11.77% |
UD08.L UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc | 25.78% | 14.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between WRDA.L and UD08.L is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.05 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2025 | -0.03 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WRDA.L vs. UD08.L — Risk / Return Rank
WRDA.L
UD08.L
WRDA.L vs. UD08.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) and UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WRDA.L | UD08.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.58 | -0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 6.75 | -2.56 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.71 | 21.31 | -4.60 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WRDA.L | UD08.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.73 | 3.10 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.51 | 2.71 | -1.20 |
Drawdowns
WRDA.L vs. UD08.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WRDA.L drawdown since its inception was -18.38%, which is greater than UD08.L's maximum drawdown of -6.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRDA.L and UD08.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRDA.L | UD08.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | -6.43% | -11.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.53% | -6.43% | -0.10% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.19% | -0.55% | +0.36% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.28% | -1.41% | -0.87% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.64% | 2.04% | -0.40% |
Volatility
WRDA.L vs. UD08.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) is 2.48%, while UBS ETF (IE) CMCI ex-Agriculture SF UCITS ETF (hedged to GBP) A-acc (UD08.L) has a volatility of 2.74%. This indicates that WRDA.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UD08.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WRDA.L | UD08.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.48% | 2.74% | -0.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.16% | 11.73% | -4.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.07% | 14.00% | -3.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 14.97% | -2.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.35% | 14.97% | -2.62% |
WRDA.L vs. UD08.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRDA.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than UD08.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
WRDA.L vs. UD08.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WRDA.L nor UD08.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WRDA.L and UD08.L have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WRDA.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WRDA.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for UD08.L.
WRDA.L is categorized as Global Equities, while UD08.L is Commodities. WRDA.L tracks MSCI World Index, while UD08.L tracks UBS CMCI Ex-Agriculture Ex-Livestock Capped (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.06% for WRDA.L and 0.34% for UD08.L.
Find the right allocation for WRDA.L and UD08.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer