WRDA.L vs. MWRD.L
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L).
WRDA.L and MWRD.L are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. WRDA.L is a passively managed fund by UBS that tracks the performance of the MSCI World Index. It was launched on Aug 5, 2025. MWRD.L is a passively managed fund by Amundi that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI NR USD. It was launched on Nov 11, 2016. Both WRDA.L and MWRD.L are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
WRDA.L vs. MWRD.L - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WRDA.L vs. MWRD.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WRDA.L UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc | -1.39% | 12.77% | 20.02% |
MWRD.L Amundi Index MSCI World | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Returns By Period
WRDA.L
- 1D
- 1.76%
- 1M
- -3.44%
- YTD
- -1.39%
- 6M
- 2.20%
- 1Y
- 16.89%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MWRD.L
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WRDA.L vs. MWRD.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WRDA.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than MWRD.L's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
WRDA.L vs. MWRD.L — Risk / Return Rank
WRDA.L
MWRD.L
WRDA.L vs. MWRD.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS Core MSCI World UCITS ETF USD Acc (WRDA.L) and Amundi Index MSCI World (MWRD.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WRDA.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.23 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.71 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.59 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.58 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WRDA.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.13 | — | — |
Dividends
WRDA.L vs. MWRD.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WRDA.L nor MWRD.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
WRDA.L vs. MWRD.L - Drawdown Comparison
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WRDA.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.06% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.67% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.41% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.76% | — | — |
Volatility
WRDA.L vs. MWRD.L - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WRDA.L | MWRD.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.18% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.10% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.54% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 12.54% | — | — |