PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WRAIX vs. BGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WRAIX vs. BGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WRAIX achieves a 4.24% return, which is significantly higher than BGX's -4.05% return. Over the past 10 years, WRAIX has underperformed BGX with an annualized return of 5.38%, while BGX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.09% annualized return.


WRAIX

1D
-0.07%
1M
0.94%
6M
3.45%
YTD
4.24%
1Y
7.33%
3Y*
8.42%
5Y*
5.32%
10Y*
5.38%

BGX

1D
-0.28%
1M
0.57%
6M
-4.38%
YTD
-4.05%
1Y
-5.57%
3Y*
8.06%
5Y*
2.41%
10Y*
6.09%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WRAIX vs. BGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WRAIX
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund
4.24%9.13%7.74%7.73%-3.41%6.52%1.04%12.34%-2.67%9.75%
BGX
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
-4.05%2.09%19.83%18.92%-20.57%17.54%-5.67%24.98%-4.19%7.28%

Correlation

The correlation between WRAIX and BGX is 0.33, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2012

0.30

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WRAIX vs. BGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WRAIX
WRAIX Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
WRAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WRAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
WRAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
WRAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
WRAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank

BGX
BGX Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
BGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
BGX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
BGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
BGX Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WRAIX vs. BGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) and Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WRAIXBGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.88

+0.35

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.45

-0.45

+1.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.00

-0.88

+6.88

WRAIX vs. BGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WRAIX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is higher than the BGX Sharpe Ratio of -0.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WRAIX and BGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WRAIX vs. BGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WRAIX drawdown since its inception was -15.44%, smaller than the maximum BGX drawdown of -47.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WRAIX and BGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WRAIXBGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-15.44%

-47.40%

+31.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.03%

-12.43%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.03%

-14.08%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-9.24%

-25.94%

+16.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.44%

-47.40%

+31.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.20%

-7.73%

+7.53%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.97%

-6.99%

+5.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.21%

6.38%

-5.17%

Volatility

WRAIX vs. BGX - Volatility Comparison

Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) has a higher volatility of 2.00% compared to Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund (BGX) at 1.02%. This indicates that WRAIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WRAIXBGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.00%

1.02%

+0.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.16%

5.71%

-0.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

6.23%

7.84%

-1.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.53%

11.73%

-5.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.76%

17.51%

-10.75%

WRAIX vs. BGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WRAIX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is lower than BGX's 1.46% expense ratio.


Dividends

WRAIX vs. BGX - Dividend Comparison

WRAIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.17%, less than BGX's 9.06% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BGX
Blackstone Long-Short Credit Income Fund
9.06%8.87%9.89%11.71%8.15%7.01%8.76%9.35%11.74%7.12%9.01%8.72%
WRAIX
Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund
0.17%0.17%1.47%1.31%2.77%0.52%1.98%1.15%1.25%1.15%0.30%2.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


WRAIX and BGX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WRAIX has higher volatility (2.00%) compared to BGX (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WRAIX dropped -15.44% vs BGX's -47.40%.

WRAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.17 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WRAIX and BGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer