WQTM vs. QUTM.DE
WQTM (WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund) and QUTM.DE (VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc) are both Technology Equities funds. WQTM is actively managed, while QUTM.DE is passively managed. A 0.69 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQTM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for QUTM.DE.
Performance
WQTM vs. QUTM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WQTM is traded in USD, while QUTM.DE is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the QUTM.DE values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WQTM achieves a 53.55% return, which is significantly higher than QUTM.DE's 34.24% return.
WQTM
- 1D
- -3.80%
- 1M
- 23.76%
- YTD
- 53.55%
- 6M
- 48.21%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QUTM.DE
- 1D
- -2.21%
- 1M
- 20.86%
- YTD
- 34.24%
- 6M
- 35.91%
- 1Y
- 64.87%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WQTM vs. QUTM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WQTM WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund | 53.55% | -14.56% |
QUTM.DE VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc | 34.24% | -9.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQTM and QUTM.DE is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2025 | 0.69 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQTM vs. QUTM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WQTM
QUTM.DE
WQTM vs. QUTM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree Quantum Computing Fund (WQTM) and VanEck Quantum Computing UCITS ETF A USD Acc (QUTM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WQTM | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.12 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.26 | 1.87 | -0.61 |
Drawdowns
WQTM vs. QUTM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WQTM drawdown since its inception was -26.13%, which is greater than QUTM.DE's maximum drawdown of -24.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WQTM and QUTM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQTM | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.13% | -24.36% | -1.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.36% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.80% | -2.21% | -1.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.75% | -7.59% | -4.16% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.04% | — |
Volatility
WQTM vs. QUTM.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQTM | QUTM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.61% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 21.53% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.98% | 30.43% | +11.55% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 30.43% | +11.55% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.98% | 30.43% | +11.55% |
WQTM vs. QUTM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQTM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QUTM.DE's 0.55% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQTM vs. QUTM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WQTM nor QUTM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WQTM and QUTM.DE have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WQTM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WQTM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for WQTM and 0.55% for QUTM.DE.
Find the right allocation for WQTM and QUTM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer