PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

WQDS.L (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and PRWU.L (Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)) are both Global Equities funds - WQDS.L tracks the MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index while PRWU.L tracks the MSCI ACWI NR USD. Both are passively managed. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WQDS.L charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for PRWU.L.

Performance

WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

WQDS.L is traded in GBp, while PRWU.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the PRWU.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

WQDS.L

1D
0.14%
1M
7.68%
YTD
15.10%
6M
15.33%
1Y
33.20%
3Y*
17.21%
5Y*
13.76%
10Y*
—

PRWU.L

1D
—
1M
—
YTD
—
6M
—
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		15.10%16.53%12.46%11.62%3.30%
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)		0.00%0.00%20.63%18.25%1.23%

Correlation

The correlation between WQDS.L and PRWU.L is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2022

0.55

The correlation between WQDS.L and PRWU.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.49 to 0.55 - a consistent structural relationship.

WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
WQDS.L
PRWU.L

Technology

35.2%
27.0%

Financial Services

16.9%
15.8%

Healthcare

14.4%
10.7%

Industrials

11.1%
9.9%

Communication Services

5.4%
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

4.3%
10.5%

Energy

4.1%
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
6.1%

Utilities

3.1%
2.7%

Real Estate

1.3%
2.1%

Basic Materials

0.7%
3.2%

Technology

WQDS.L
35.2%
PRWU.L
27.0%

Financial Services

WQDS.L
16.9%
PRWU.L
15.8%

Healthcare

WQDS.L
14.4%
PRWU.L
10.7%

Industrials

WQDS.L
11.1%
PRWU.L
9.9%

Communication Services

WQDS.L
5.4%
PRWU.L
8.1%

Consumer Cyclical

WQDS.L
4.3%
PRWU.L
10.5%

Energy

WQDS.L
4.1%
PRWU.L
4.0%

Consumer Defensive

WQDS.L
3.6%
PRWU.L
6.1%

Utilities

WQDS.L
3.1%
PRWU.L
2.7%

Real Estate

WQDS.L
1.3%
PRWU.L
2.1%

Basic Materials

WQDS.L
0.7%
PRWU.L
3.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)

Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)

Often compared with WQDS.L:
WQDS.L vs. PSRE.LWQDS.L vs. FGQD.LWQDS.L vs. VGWD.DEWQDS.L vs. TDGB.LWQDS.L vs. NQSE.DEWQDS.L vs. IS3Q.DEWQDS.L vs. UDVD.L
Often compared with PRWU.L:
PRWU.L vs. SPYI.DEPRWU.L vs. VWRA.LPRWU.L vs. SWDA.LPRWU.L vs. LILMPRWU.L vs. CSPX.LPRWU.L vs. SWRD.LPRWU.L vs. VT

Return for Risk

WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
WQDS.L
WQDS.L Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
WQDS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 9393
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
PRWU.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (WQDS.L) and Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C) (PRWU.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

WQDS.LPRWU.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
3.19

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
4.56

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.60

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.90

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.20

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

WQDS.LPRWU.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.19

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.19

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.80

—

—

Drawdowns

WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L - Drawdown Comparison

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

WQDS.LPRWU.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.24%

—

—

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.75%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.93%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-14.93%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

—

—

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.87%

—

—

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.82%

—

—

Volatility

WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

WQDS.LPRWU.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.09%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

7.72%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

10.37%

—

—

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.58%

—

—

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.22%

—

—

WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQDS.L has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than PRWU.L's 0.05% expense ratio.

Dividends

WQDS.L vs. PRWU.L - Dividend Comparison

WQDS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%, while PRWU.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
PRWU.L
Amundi Prime Global UCITS ETF DR (C)		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WQDS.L
iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend ESG UCITS ETF USD (Dist)		2.90%3.12%3.24%3.55%3.56%3.71%3.84%3.98%4.19%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

WQDS.L and PRWU.L have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, PRWU.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

PRWU.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDS.L.

WQDS.L tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield ESG Reduced Carbon Target Select Index, while PRWU.L tracks MSCI ACWI NR USD. They also come from different issuers: iShares and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WQDS.L and 0.05% for PRWU.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WQDS.L and PRWU.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer