PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (WQDA.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WQDA.AS

1D
0.23%
1M
6.44%
YTD
14.41%
6M
15.98%
1Y
31.03%
3Y*
19.49%
5Y*
11.93%
10Y*

DFND.AS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WQDA.AS and DFND.AS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2024

0.28

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WQDA.AS
WQDA.AS Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
WQDA.AS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WQDA.AS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8585
Sortino Ratio Rank
WQDA.AS Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
WQDA.AS Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
WQDA.AS Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

DFND.AS
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (WQDA.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WQDA.ASDFND.ASDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.46

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

14.71

WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WQDA.ASDFND.ASDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.56

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.86

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.07

Drawdowns

WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WQDA.ASDFND.ASDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-21.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.56%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-21.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.23%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

Volatility

WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WQDA.ASDFND.ASDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.65%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.94%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.78%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.48%

WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison

WQDA.AS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison

Neither WQDA.AS nor DFND.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


WQDA.AS and DFND.AS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, DFND.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

DFND.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDA.AS.

WQDA.AS is categorized as Dividend, while DFND.AS is Industrials Equities. WQDA.AS tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield Advanced Select Index, while DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WQDA.AS and 0.35% for DFND.AS.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WQDA.AS and DFND.AS

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer