WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS
WQDA.AS (iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Acc) and DFND.AS (iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WQDA.AS is a Dividend fund tracking the MSCI World High Dividend Yield Advanced Select Index, while DFND.AS is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Both are passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WQDA.AS charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for DFND.AS.
Performance
WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WQDA.AS
- 1D
- 0.23%
- 1M
- 6.44%
- YTD
- 14.41%
- 6M
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 31.03%
- 3Y*
- 19.49%
- 5Y*
- 11.93%
- 10Y*
- —
DFND.AS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WQDA.AS iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Acc | 14.41% | 24.48% | 7.86% |
DFND.AS iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 16.29% |
Correlation
The correlation between WQDA.AS and DFND.AS is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2024 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS — Risk / Return Rank
WQDA.AS
DFND.AS
WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares MSCI World Quality Dividend Advanced UCITS ETF USD Acc (WQDA.AS) and iShares Global Aerospace & Defence UCITS ETF (DFND.AS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WQDA.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.46 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.05 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 14.71 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WQDA.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.07 | — | — |
Drawdowns
WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WQDA.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -21.23% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.56% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.89% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.23% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.23% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.49% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.09% | — | — |
Volatility
WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WQDA.AS | DFND.AS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.63% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.94% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.78% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.48% | — | — |
WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Expense Ratio Comparison
WQDA.AS has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than DFND.AS's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WQDA.AS vs. DFND.AS - Dividend Comparison
Neither WQDA.AS nor DFND.AS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WQDA.AS and DFND.AS have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, DFND.AS is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
DFND.AS is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for WQDA.AS.
WQDA.AS is categorized as Dividend, while DFND.AS is Industrials Equities. WQDA.AS tracks MSCI World High Dividend Yield Advanced Select Index, while DFND.AS tracks S&P Developed BMI Select Aerospace & Defense 35/20 Capped Index NR. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for WQDA.AS and 0.35% for DFND.AS.
Find the right allocation for WQDA.AS and DFND.AS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer