PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WPS vs. FPRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WPS vs. FPRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WPS

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FPRO

1D
0.12%
1M
-1.08%
YTD
9.97%
6M
9.24%
1Y
10.32%
3Y*
9.14%
5Y*
3.13%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WPS vs. FPRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
WPS
iShares International Developed Property ETF
0.00%0.00%-3.59%7.43%-24.74%9.90%
FPRO
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF
9.97%2.60%5.63%10.93%-25.02%40.13%

Correlation

The correlation between WPS and FPRO is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021

0.52

The correlation between WPS and FPRO shifts across timeframes, from 0.39 (3 years) to 0.52 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

WPS vs. FPRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
WPS
FPRO

Real Estate

100.0%
99.4%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Real Estate

WPS
100.0%
FPRO
99.4%

Basic Materials

WPS

-

FPRO

-

Communication Services

WPS

-

FPRO
0.6%

Consumer Cyclical

WPS

-

FPRO

-

Consumer Defensive

WPS

-

FPRO

-

Energy

WPS

-

FPRO

-

Financial Services

WPS

-

FPRO

-

Healthcare

WPS

-

FPRO

-

Industrials

WPS

-

FPRO

-

Technology

WPS

-

FPRO

-

Utilities

WPS

-

FPRO

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WPS vs. FPRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WPS

FPRO
FPRO Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
FPRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPRO Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
FPRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPRO Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WPS vs. FPRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF (FPRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WPS vs. FPRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WPSFPRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.35

Drawdowns

WPS vs. FPRO - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WPSFPRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-32.81%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.67%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.83%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-32.81%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.67%

Volatility

WPS vs. FPRO - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WPSFPRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.54%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.13%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.10%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.62%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

WPS vs. FPRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

WPS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than FPRO's 0.59% expense ratio.


Dividends

WPS vs. FPRO - Dividend Comparison

WPS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FPRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FPRO
Fidelity Real Estate Investment ETF
2.57%2.69%2.50%2.83%2.67%1.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WPS
iShares International Developed Property ETF
0.00%0.00%2.48%2.38%2.63%4.36%2.31%6.81%4.45%4.31%5.73%3.20%

Frequently Asked Questions


WPS and FPRO have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, WPS is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

WPS is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FPRO.

FPRO has the higher dividend yield at 2.57%, compared with 0.00% for WPS.

They also come from different issuers: iShares and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for WPS and 0.59% for FPRO.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WPS and FPRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer