WPS vs. BLDG
WPS (iShares International Developed Property ETF) and BLDG (Cambria Global Real Estate ETF) are both REIT funds. WPS is passively managed, while BLDG is actively managed. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WPS charges 0.48%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for BLDG.
Performance
WPS vs. BLDG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WPS
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BLDG
- 1D
- 0.77%
- 1M
- 2.76%
- YTD
- 10.61%
- 6M
- 10.84%
- 1Y
- 12.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.30%
- 5Y*
- 3.04%
- 10Y*
- —
WPS vs. BLDG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WPS iShares International Developed Property ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | -3.59% | 7.43% | -24.74% | 9.05% | 15.97% |
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 10.61% | 4.26% | 8.18% | 1.76% | -14.66% | 22.47% | 15.25% |
Correlation
The correlation between WPS and BLDG is 0.61, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.61 |
The correlation between WPS and BLDG shifts across timeframes, from 0.44 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WPS vs. BLDG — Risk / Return Rank
WPS
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
BLDG
WPS vs. BLDG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares International Developed Property ETF (WPS) and Cambria Global Real Estate ETF (BLDG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WPS | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.19 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.25 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 4.38 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WPS vs. BLDG - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WPS | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -27.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -10.08% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -18.57% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -27.25% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -1.07% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -9.14% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.87% | — |
Volatility
WPS vs. BLDG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WPS | BLDG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.65% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 9.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 11.59% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 15.29% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 15.55% | — |
WPS vs. BLDG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WPS has a 0.48% expense ratio, which is lower than BLDG's 0.59% expense ratio.
Dividends
WPS vs. BLDG - Dividend Comparison
WPS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BLDG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.31%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLDG Cambria Global Real Estate ETF | 5.31% | 7.46% | 7.97% | 4.99% | 3.99% | 10.40% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WPS iShares International Developed Property ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 2.48% | 2.38% | 2.63% | 4.36% | 2.31% | 6.81% | 4.45% | 4.31% | 5.73% | 3.20% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WPS and BLDG have a correlation of 0.61, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, WPS is cheaper at 0.48% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
WPS is cheaper with a 0.48% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for BLDG.
BLDG has the higher dividend yield at 5.31%, compared with 0.00% for WPS.
They also come from different issuers: iShares and Cambria. Their fees differ too: 0.48% for WPS and 0.59% for BLDG.
Find the right allocation for WPS and BLDG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer