WOR vs. AP
WOR (Worthington Industries, Inc.) and AP (Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Metal Fabrication industry within the Industrials sector. Over the past 10 years, WOR returned 12.49%/yr vs -0.81%/yr for AP. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
WOR vs. AP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOR achieves a 20.10% return, which is significantly lower than AP's 99.62% return. Over the past 10 years, WOR has outperformed AP with an annualized return of 12.49%, while AP has yielded a comparatively lower -0.81% annualized return.
WOR
- 1D
- 1.80%
- 1M
- 11.87%
- YTD
- 20.10%
- 6M
- 17.33%
- 1Y
- 6.76%
- 3Y*
- 19.75%
- 5Y*
- 13.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.49%
AP
- 1D
- -1.48%
- 1M
- 4.72%
- YTD
- 99.62%
- 6M
- 165.34%
- 1Y
- 255.85%
- 3Y*
- 53.88%
- 5Y*
- 11.51%
- 10Y*
- -0.81%
WOR vs. AP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOR Worthington Industries, Inc. | 20.10% | 30.29% | -29.34% | 91.65% | -6.90% | 8.43% | 25.21% | 24.08% | -19.30% | -5.48% |
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation | 99.62% | 155.02% | -23.44% | 8.76% | -49.80% | -8.76% | 82.06% | -2.90% | -75.00% | -25.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between WOR and AP is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.26 |
The correlation between WOR and AP shifts across timeframes, from 0.15 (1 year) to 0.26 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
WOR:
$3.02B
AP:
$215.32M
WOR:
$2.27
AP:
-$3.37
WOR:
2.28
AP:
0.50
WOR:
3.02
AP:
6.87
WOR:
$1.33B
AP:
$433.03M
WOR:
$369.08M
AP:
$53.11M
WOR:
$159.44M
AP:
$20.56M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOR vs. AP — Risk / Return Rank
WOR
AP
WOR vs. AP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WOR | AP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.77 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.37 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.23 | 5.07 | -4.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.42 | 11.46 | -11.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WOR vs. AP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOR drawdown since its inception was -70.94%, smaller than the maximum AP drawdown of -98.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOR and AP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOR | AP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.94% | -98.06% | +27.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.83% | -50.80% | +20.97% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.42% | -80.96% | +38.54% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.42% | -88.58% | +46.16% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.53% | -95.90% | +31.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.52% | -72.46% | +64.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.22% | -52.24% | +32.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.15% | 22.43% | -6.28% |
Volatility
WOR vs. AP - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) is 4.95%, while Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation (AP) has a volatility of 24.08%. This indicates that WOR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WOR | AP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.95% | 24.08% | -19.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.40% | 68.36% | -47.96% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.22% | 86.12% | -56.90% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.16% | 74.88% | -36.72% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.98% | 72.90% | -32.92% |
Dividends
WOR vs. AP - Dividend Comparison
WOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, while AP has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AP Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.45% | 2.69% | 7.02% |
WOR Worthington Industries, Inc. | 1.24% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 49.97% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 1.91% | 2.23% | 2.53% | 1.86% | 1.64% | 2.46% |
Financials
WOR vs. AP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Worthington Industries, Inc. and Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WOR vs. AP - Profitability Comparison
WOR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 110.20M and revenue of 378.68M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 29.1%.
AP - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a gross profit of 0.00 and revenue of 103.13M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 0.0%.
WOR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 28.15M and revenue of 378.68M, resulting in an operating margin of 7.4%.
AP - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported an operating income of 2.56M and revenue of 103.13M, resulting in an operating margin of 2.5%.
WOR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 45.46M and revenue of 378.68M, resulting in a net margin of 12.0%.
AP - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Ampco-Pittsburgh Corporation reported a net income of -867.00K and revenue of 103.13M, resulting in a net margin of -0.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WOR and AP have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AP has higher volatility (24.08%) compared to WOR (4.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOR dropped -70.94% vs AP's -98.06%.
AP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.00 vs 0.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WOR and AP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer