PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WOR vs. GWW
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WOR vs. GWW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WOR achieves a 6.00% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 36.88% return. Over the past 10 years, WOR has underperformed GWW with an annualized return of 9.11%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively higher 21.39% annualized return.


WOR

1D
2.86%
1M
-8.77%
6M
1.59%
YTD
6.00%
1Y
-13.42%
3Y*
9.67%
5Y*
9.34%
10Y*
9.11%

GWW

1D
0.80%
1M
4.55%
6M
34.12%
YTD
36.88%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
21.06%
5Y*
25.95%
10Y*
21.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WOR vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WOR
Worthington Industries, Inc.
6.00%30.29%-29.34%91.65%-6.90%8.43%25.21%24.08%-19.30%-5.48%
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
36.88%-3.41%28.21%50.53%8.75%28.80%22.85%22.25%21.69%4.35%

Correlation

The correlation between WOR and GWW is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.37

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WOR:

$2.69B

GWW:

$64.95B

EPS

WOR:

$3.18

GWW:

$37.36

PE Ratio

WOR:

17.08

GWW:

36.83

PS Ratio

WOR:

1.93

GWW:

3.57

PB Ratio

WOR:

2.58

GWW:

16.59

Total Revenue (TTM)

WOR:

$1.38B

GWW:

$18.38B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WOR:

$377.55M

GWW:

$7.20B

EBITDA (TTM)

WOR:

$209.55M

GWW:

$2.82B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WOR vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WOR
WOR Risk / Return Rank: 2525
Overall Rank
WOR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WOR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
WOR Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
WOR Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
WOR Martin Ratio Rank: 2727
Martin Ratio Rank

GWW
GWW Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
GWW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GWW Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
GWW Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
GWW Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
GWW Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WOR vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WORGWWDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.78

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.94

1.26

-0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.49

2.44

-2.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.87

5.00

-5.87

WOR vs. GWW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WOR Sharpe Ratio is -0.48, which is lower than the GWW Sharpe Ratio of 1.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WOR and GWW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WOR vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WOR drawdown since its inception was -70.94%, which is greater than GWW's maximum drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOR and GWW.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WORGWWDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-70.94%

-56.73%

-14.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.83%

-13.35%

-16.48%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.42%

-24.50%

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-42.42%

-24.50%

-17.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.53%

-41.60%

-22.93%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.38%

0.00%

-18.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-20.21%

-10.99%

-9.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.59%

6.51%

+10.08%

Volatility

WOR vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison

Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) has a higher volatility of 10.64% compared to W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 6.81%. This indicates that WOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WORGWWDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.64%

6.81%

+3.83%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.80%

18.22%

+3.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

30.15%

25.13%

+5.02%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

38.24%

24.71%

+13.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

39.82%

28.53%

+11.29%

Dividends

WOR vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison

WOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, more than GWW's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GWW
W.W. Grainger, Inc.
0.67%0.88%0.76%0.88%1.22%1.23%1.45%1.68%1.90%2.14%2.08%2.27%
WOR
Worthington Industries, Inc.
1.40%1.40%1.65%49.97%2.37%1.99%1.91%2.23%2.53%1.86%1.64%2.46%

Financials

WOR vs. GWW - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Worthington Industries, Inc. and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B20222023202420252026
371.46M
4.74B
(WOR) Total Revenue
(GWW) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WOR vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Worthington Industries, Inc. and W.W. Grainger, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%35.0%40.0%20222023202420252026
27.4%
40.0%
Portfolio components
WOR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 101.89M and revenue of 371.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.

GWW - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.

WOR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.58M and revenue of 371.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.

GWW - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.

WOR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 48.15M and revenue of 371.46M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.

GWW - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WOR and GWW have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WOR has higher volatility (10.64%) compared to GWW (6.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOR dropped -70.94% vs GWW's -56.73%.

GWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.30 vs -0.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WOR and GWW

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer