WOR vs. GWW
WOR (Worthington Industries, Inc.) and GWW (W.W. Grainger, Inc.) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — WOR in Metal Fabrication, GWW in Industrial Distribution. Over the past 10 years, WOR returned 9.89%/yr vs 22.21%/yr for GWW. Their 0.37 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
WOR vs. GWW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOR achieves a 9.79% return, which is significantly lower than GWW's 37.52% return. Over the past 10 years, WOR has underperformed GWW with an annualized return of 9.89%, while GWW has yielded a comparatively higher 22.21% annualized return.
WOR
- 1D
- 1.01%
- 1M
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 1.89%
- YTD
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- -7.38%
- 3Y*
- 8.58%
- 5Y*
- 9.26%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
- ALL TIME*
- 9.26%
GWW
- 1D
- 1.97%
- 1M
- 2.92%
- 6M
- 28.49%
- YTD
- 37.52%
- 1Y
- 49.53%
- 3Y*
- 25.05%
- 5Y*
- 26.76%
- 10Y*
- 22.21%
- ALL TIME*
- 15.18%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $387.12M | $359.88M | $405.44M | |
| $11.75M | $13.40M | $13.80M |
WOR vs. GWW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOR Worthington Industries, Inc. | 9.79% | 30.29% | -29.34% | 91.65% | -6.90% | 8.43% | 25.21% | 24.08% | -19.30% | -5.48% |
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 37.52% | -3.41% | 28.21% | 50.53% | 8.75% | 28.80% | 22.85% | 22.25% | 21.69% | 4.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between WOR and GWW is 0.46, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.45 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.46 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990 | 0.37 |
Fundamentals
WOR:
$2.79B
GWW:
$65.26B
WOR:
$3.18
GWW:
$37.36
WOR:
17.69
GWW:
37.00
WOR:
2.00
GWW:
3.59
WOR:
2.67
GWW:
16.67
WOR:
$1.38B
GWW:
$18.38B
WOR:
$377.55M
GWW:
$7.20B
WOR:
$209.55M
GWW:
$2.82B
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WOR vs. GWW — Risk / Return Rank
WOR
GWW
WOR vs. GWW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) and W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WOR | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.61 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | 1.27 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.27 | 2.57 | -2.84 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 6.73 | -7.20 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WOR vs. GWW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOR drawdown since its inception was -70.94%, which is greater than GWW's maximum drawdown of -56.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOR and GWW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOR | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -70.94% | -56.73% | -14.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.83% | -13.35% | -16.48% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.42% | -24.50% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -42.42% | -24.50% | -17.92% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -64.53% | -41.60% | -22.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -15.46% | -1.41% | -14.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.21% | -10.98% | -9.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 17.06% | 5.68% | +11.38% |
Volatility
WOR vs. GWW - Volatility Comparison
Worthington Industries, Inc. (WOR) has a higher volatility of 7.86% compared to W.W. Grainger, Inc. (GWW) at 6.07%. This indicates that WOR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GWW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WOR | GWW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.86% | 6.07% | +1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.65% | 18.19% | +3.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 30.60% | 25.43% | +5.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 38.20% | 24.72% | +13.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 39.84% | 28.53% | +11.31% |
Dividends
WOR vs. GWW - Dividend Comparison
WOR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.35%, more than GWW's 0.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GWW W.W. Grainger, Inc. | 0.67% | 0.88% | 0.76% | 0.88% | 1.22% | 1.23% | 1.45% | 1.68% | 1.90% | 2.14% | 2.08% | 2.27% |
WOR Worthington Industries, Inc. | 1.35% | 1.40% | 1.65% | 49.97% | 2.37% | 1.99% | 1.91% | 2.23% | 2.53% | 1.86% | 1.64% | 2.46% |
Financials
WOR vs. GWW - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Worthington Industries, Inc. and W.W. Grainger, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
WOR vs. GWW - Profitability Comparison
WOR - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported a gross profit of 101.89M and revenue of 371.46M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 27.4%.
GWW - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.90B and revenue of 4.74B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.0%.
WOR - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported an operating income of 17.58M and revenue of 371.46M, resulting in an operating margin of 4.7%.
GWW - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported an operating income of 793.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.7%.
WOR - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Worthington Industries, Inc. reported a net income of 48.15M and revenue of 371.46M, resulting in a net margin of 13.0%.
GWW - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, W.W. Grainger, Inc. reported a net income of 555.00M and revenue of 4.74B, resulting in a net margin of 11.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
WOR and GWW have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WOR has higher volatility (7.86%) compared to GWW (6.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WOR dropped -70.94% vs GWW's -56.73%.
GWW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.35 vs -0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WOR and GWW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer