WOOPX vs. LLSCX
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund (WOOPX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX).
WOOPX is managed by JPMorgan. It was launched on May 31, 1991. LLSCX is managed by Longleaf Partners. It was launched on Feb 21, 1989.
Performance
WOOPX vs. LLSCX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WOOPX vs. LLSCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOOPX JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund | -5.01% | -2.61% | 11.33% | 13.31% | -18.98% | 23.19% | 10.20% | 26.22% | -11.49% | 16.94% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | -3.68% | 7.56% | 9.69% | 20.17% | -19.25% | 11.18% | 4.17% | 27.74% | -6.52% | 9.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WOOPX achieves a -5.01% return, which is significantly lower than LLSCX's -3.68% return. Over the past 10 years, WOOPX has underperformed LLSCX with an annualized return of 6.29%, while LLSCX has yielded a comparatively higher 6.69% annualized return.
WOOPX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -8.97%
- YTD
- -5.01%
- 6M
- -5.59%
- 1Y
- -2.68%
- 3Y*
- 4.29%
- 5Y*
- 1.68%
- 10Y*
- 6.29%
LLSCX
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- -3.81%
- YTD
- -3.68%
- 6M
- -2.59%
- 1Y
- 2.07%
- 3Y*
- 9.42%
- 5Y*
- 1.87%
- 10Y*
- 6.69%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WOOPX vs. LLSCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WOOPX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is lower than LLSCX's 0.95% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WOOPX vs. LLSCX — Risk / Return Rank
WOOPX
LLSCX
WOOPX vs. LLSCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund (WOOPX) and Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WOOPX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.11 | 0.15 | -0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.01 | 0.32 | -0.33 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.04 | -0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.29 | 0.10 | -0.40 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.84 | 0.30 | -1.14 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WOOPX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.11 | 0.15 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.09 | 0.11 | -0.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | 0.27 | +0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.45 | 0.51 | -0.06 |
Correlation
The correlation between WOOPX and LLSCX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WOOPX vs. LLSCX - Dividend Comparison
WOOPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.35%, more than LLSCX's 1.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOOPX JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund | 7.35% | 6.98% | 1.62% | 0.49% | 12.28% | 20.40% | 3.88% | 11.31% | 26.09% | 7.74% | 0.72% | 9.47% |
LLSCX Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund | 1.22% | 1.17% | 0.11% | 0.94% | 1.20% | 0.82% | 5.85% | 14.89% | 18.13% | 8.43% | 18.01% | 5.91% |
Drawdowns
WOOPX vs. LLSCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WOOPX drawdown since its inception was -58.15%, smaller than the maximum LLSCX drawdown of -63.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WOOPX and LLSCX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WOOPX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.15% | -63.97% | +5.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.98% | -10.47% | -3.51% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.94% | -28.37% | +3.43% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -41.30% | -42.23% | +0.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.76% | -7.92% | -6.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.22% | -8.90% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.87% | 3.68% | +1.19% |
Volatility
WOOPX vs. LLSCX - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan SMID Cap Equity Fund (WOOPX) has a higher volatility of 5.52% compared to Longleaf Partners Small-Cap Fund (LLSCX) at 3.90%. This indicates that WOOPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LLSCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WOOPX | LLSCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.52% | 3.90% | +1.62% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.77% | 9.23% | +2.54% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.12% | 15.42% | +5.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.73% | 17.00% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.13% | 24.58% | -4.45% |