WNTR vs. IBIT
WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and IBIT (iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WNTR is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by YieldMax, while IBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Bitcoin Reference Rate - New York Variant. WNTR is actively managed, while IBIT is passively managed. Over the past year, WNTR returned 82.67% vs -39.82% for IBIT. At a correlation of -0.81, they often move in opposite directions. WNTR charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for IBIT.
Performance
WNTR vs. IBIT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WNTR achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly higher than IBIT's -28.88% return.
WNTR
- 1D
- 2.49%
- 1M
- 29.67%
- YTD
- 4.20%
- 6M
- 8.46%
- 1Y
- 82.67%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IBIT
- 1D
- -3.26%
- 1M
- -17.81%
- YTD
- -28.88%
- 6M
- -28.88%
- 1Y
- -39.82%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WNTR vs. IBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 4.20% | 52.78% |
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | -28.88% | 0.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between WNTR and IBIT is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025 | -0.81 |
The correlation between WNTR and IBIT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.82 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WNTR vs. IBIT — Risk / Return Rank
WNTR
IBIT
WNTR vs. IBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WNTR | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.48 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 0.86 | +0.41 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.95 | -0.77 | +2.71 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.97 | -1.30 | +6.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WNTR vs. IBIT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNTR drawdown since its inception was -42.65%, smaller than the maximum IBIT drawdown of -52.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNTR and IBIT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNTR | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.65% | -52.11% | +9.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -42.65% | -52.11% | +9.46% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.99% | -50.47% | +35.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.96% | -16.85% | -4.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 16.80% | 30.58% | -13.78% |
Volatility
WNTR vs. IBIT - Volatility Comparison
YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a higher volatility of 16.94% compared to iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF (IBIT) at 13.18%. This indicates that WNTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WNTR | IBIT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.94% | 13.18% | +3.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 45.74% | 34.64% | +11.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 52.52% | 44.31% | +8.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.92% | 50.22% | +2.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.92% | 50.22% | +2.70% |
WNTR vs. IBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison
WNTR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than IBIT's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
WNTR vs. IBIT - Dividend Comparison
WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.47%, while IBIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
IBIT iShares Bitcoin Trust ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF | 102.47% | 58.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WNTR and IBIT have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
WNTR has higher volatility (16.94%) compared to IBIT (13.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WNTR dropped -42.65% vs IBIT's -52.11%.
On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 82.67% vs -39.82% for IBIT. On fees, IBIT is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, IBIT has been the lower-risk option at 13.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 82.67% return vs -39.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
IBIT is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.
WNTR has the higher dividend yield at 102.47%, compared with 0.00% for IBIT.
WNTR is categorized as Derivative Income, while IBIT is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and iShares. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WNTR and 0.25% for IBIT.
WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for WNTR and IBIT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer