WNTR vs. CONY

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and CONY (YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds from YieldMax. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WNTR returned 82.67% vs -49.52% for CONY. At a correlation of -0.73, they often move in opposite directions. WNTR charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CONY.

Performance

WNTR vs. CONY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNTR achieves a 4.20% return, which is significantly higher than CONY's -26.79% return.

WNTR

• 1D: 2.49%
• 1M: 29.67%
• YTD: 4.20%
• 6M: 8.46%
• 1Y: 82.67%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CONY

• 1D: -3.16%
• 1M: -11.77%
• YTD: -26.79%
• 6M: -30.97%
• 1Y: -49.52%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WNTR vs. CONY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	4.20%	52.78%
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	-26.79%	-8.73%

Correlation

The correlation between WNTR and CONY is -0.76, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.73

The correlation between WNTR and CONY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.76 to -0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WNTR vs. CONY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 41
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 47
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 41
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 43
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 35

CONY

CONY Risk / Return Rank: 2
CONY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Omega Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
CONY Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNTR vs. CONY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WNTR	CONY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	-0.86	+2.44
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.99	-1.22	+3.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.86	+0.41
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.95	-0.78	+2.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	4.97	-1.24	+6.21

WNTR vs. CONY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNTR Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the CONY Sharpe Ratio of -0.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNTR and CONY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WNTR vs. CONY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNTR drawdown since its inception was -42.65%, smaller than the maximum CONY drawdown of -63.57%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNTR and CONY.

Drawdown Indicators

	WNTR	CONY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.65%	-63.57%	+20.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.65%	-63.39%	+20.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-14.99%	-58.53%	+43.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.96%	-22.83%	+1.87%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.80%	39.89%	-23.09%

Volatility

WNTR vs. CONY - Volatility Comparison

YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) has a higher volatility of 16.94% compared to YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF (CONY) at 15.74%. This indicates that WNTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CONY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WNTR	CONY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.94%	15.74%	+1.20%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	45.74%	44.42%	+1.32%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	52.52%	57.79%	-5.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.92%	59.89%	-6.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	52.92%	59.89%	-6.97%

WNTR vs. CONY - Expense Ratio Comparison

WNTR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than CONY's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

WNTR vs. CONY - Dividend Comparison

WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 102.47%, less than CONY's 204.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CONY YieldMax COIN Option Income Strategy ETF	204.97%	192.07%	155.66%	16.43%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	102.47%	58.56%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WNTR and CONY in my portfolio?

WNTR and CONY have a correlation of -0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WNTR or CONY?

WNTR has higher volatility (16.94%) compared to CONY (15.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WNTR dropped -42.65% vs CONY's -63.57%.

Which ETF is better, WNTR or CONY?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 82.67% vs -49.52% for CONY. On fees, CONY is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, CONY has been the lower-risk option at 15.74%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WNTR or CONY?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 82.67% return vs -49.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WNTR or CONY?

CONY is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WNTR or CONY?

CONY has the higher dividend yield at 204.97%, compared with 102.47% for WNTR.

What is the main difference between WNTR and CONY?

Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WNTR and 0.99% for CONY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.