WNTR vs. COIW

Last updated Jul 16, 2026

WNTR (YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF) and COIW (COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, WNTR returned 117.98% vs -66.83% for COIW. At a correlation of -0.73, they often move in opposite directions. WNTR charges 1.01%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for COIW.

Performance

WNTR vs. COIW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WNTR achieves a 6.35% return, which is significantly higher than COIW's -33.36% return.

WNTR

• 1D: 0.37%
• 1M: 20.43%
• 6M: 21.18%
• YTD: 6.35%
• 1Y: 117.98%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

COIW

• 1D: 3.97%
• 1M: -2.42%
• 6M: -42.36%
• YTD: -33.36%
• 1Y: -66.83%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WNTR vs. COIW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	6.35%	52.78%
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	-33.36%	8.97%

Correlation

The correlation between WNTR and COIW is -0.76, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.76
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2025	-0.73

The correlation between WNTR and COIW has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.76 to -0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

WNTR vs. COIW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WNTR

WNTR Risk / Return Rank: 69
WNTR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 86
WNTR Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
WNTR Omega Ratio Rank: 70
WNTR Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
WNTR Martin Ratio Rank: 51

COIW

COIW Risk / Return Rank: 2
COIW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
COIW Sortino Ratio Rank: 2
COIW Omega Ratio Rank: 3
COIW Calmar Ratio Rank: 2
COIW Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WNTR vs. COIW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) and COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WNTR	COIW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.21	-0.82	+3.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.44	-1.33	+3.76
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.33	0.85	+0.48
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	-0.89	+3.67
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.13	-1.28	+8.40

WNTR vs. COIW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WNTR Sharpe Ratio is 2.21, which is higher than the COIW Sharpe Ratio of -0.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WNTR and COIW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WNTR vs. COIW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WNTR drawdown since its inception was -42.65%, smaller than the maximum COIW drawdown of -75.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNTR and COIW.

Drawdown Indicators

	WNTR	COIW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-42.65%	-75.01%	+32.36%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-42.65%	-75.01%	+32.36%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.23%	-69.83%	+56.60%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-20.49%	-40.70%	+20.21%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	16.62%	52.39%	-35.77%

Volatility

WNTR vs. COIW - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF (WNTR) is 18.90%, while COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF (COIW) has a volatility of 20.46%. This indicates that WNTR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than COIW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WNTR	COIW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	18.90%	20.46%	-1.56%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	47.35%	64.32%	-16.97%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	53.75%	81.98%	-28.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	53.51%	89.71%	-36.20%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	53.51%	89.71%	-36.20%

WNTR vs. COIW - Expense Ratio Comparison

WNTR has a 1.01% expense ratio, which is higher than COIW's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

WNTR vs. COIW - Dividend Comparison

WNTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 105.78%, less than COIW's 212.91% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
COIW COIN WeeklyPay™ ETF	212.91%	120.37%
WNTR YieldMax Short MSTR Option Income Strategy ETF	105.78%	58.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WNTR and COIW in my portfolio?

WNTR and COIW have a correlation of -0.76, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WNTR or COIW?

COIW has higher volatility (20.46%) compared to WNTR (18.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WNTR dropped -42.65% vs COIW's -75.01%.

Which ETF is better, WNTR or COIW?

On 1-year performance, WNTR leads with 117.98% vs -66.83% for COIW. On fees, COIW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. On volatility, WNTR has been the lower-risk option at 18.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, WNTR or COIW?

Over the 1-year period, WNTR has performed better with a 117.98% return vs -66.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, WNTR or COIW?

COIW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for WNTR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WNTR or COIW?

COIW has the higher dividend yield at 212.91%, compared with 105.78% for WNTR.

What is the main difference between WNTR and COIW?

They also come from different issuers: YieldMax and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.01% for WNTR and 0.99% for COIW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WNTR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs -0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.