WNDY.L vs. IWFV.L
WNDY.L (Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc)) and IWFV.L (iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF) are both Global Equities funds - WNDY.L tracks the Solactive Wind Energy v2 Index while IWFV.L tracks the MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, WNDY.L returned -1.62%/yr vs 25.68%/yr for IWFV.L. A 0.51 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. WNDY.L charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for IWFV.L.
Performance
WNDY.L vs. IWFV.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
WNDY.L is traded in USD, while IWFV.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the IWFV.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WNDY.L achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than IWFV.L's 27.67% return.
WNDY.L
- 1D
- -0.62%
- 1M
- -10.14%
- 6M
- -7.15%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- 16.74%
- 3Y*
- -1.62%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
IWFV.L
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -4.14%
- 6M
- 23.37%
- YTD
- 27.67%
- 1Y
- 54.35%
- 3Y*
- 25.68%
- 5Y*
- 16.22%
- 10Y*
- 12.35%
WNDY.L vs. IWFV.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WNDY.L Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) | 0.09% | 32.58% | -20.21% | -19.30% | -12.05% |
IWFV.L iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF | 27.67% | 40.55% | 5.07% | 18.98% | -11.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between WNDY.L and IWFV.L is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 8, 2022 | 0.51 |
The correlation between WNDY.L and IWFV.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.48 to 0.51 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WNDY.L vs. IWFV.L — Risk / Return Rank
WNDY.L
IWFV.L
WNDY.L vs. IWFV.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNDY.L) and iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WNDY.L | IWFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.58 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.49 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.57 | -0.43 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.74 | 6.24 | -5.50 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.49 | 21.48 | -18.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WNDY.L vs. IWFV.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WNDY.L drawdown since its inception was -52.51%, which is greater than IWFV.L's maximum drawdown of -48.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WNDY.L and IWFV.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WNDY.L | IWFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.51% | -48.50% | -4.01% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -22.39% | -8.67% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -35.99% | -18.65% | -17.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -26.74% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -39.15% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -29.90% | -5.66% | -24.24% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -30.23% | -19.81% | -10.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.72% | 2.52% | +4.20% |
Volatility
WNDY.L vs. IWFV.L - Volatility Comparison
Global X Wind Energy UCITS ETF USD (Acc) (WNDY.L) has a higher volatility of 8.14% compared to iShares Edge MSCI World Value Factor UCITS ETF (IWFV.L) at 5.71%. This indicates that WNDY.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IWFV.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WNDY.L | IWFV.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.14% | 5.71% | +2.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.06% | 14.07% | +2.99% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.41% | 16.25% | +6.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 20.82% | +2.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.08% | 19.24% | +3.84% |
WNDY.L vs. IWFV.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
WNDY.L has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than IWFV.L's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
WNDY.L vs. IWFV.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither WNDY.L nor IWFV.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WNDY.L and IWFV.L have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, IWFV.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
IWFV.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for WNDY.L.
WNDY.L tracks Solactive Wind Energy v2 Index, while IWFV.L tracks MSCI ACWI Value NR USD. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for WNDY.L and 0.30% for IWFV.L.
Find the right allocation for WNDY.L and IWFV.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer