WMTI vs. XLK
WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WMTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index. WMTI is actively managed, while XLK is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.18, they often move in opposite directions. WMTI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for XLK.
Performance
WMTI vs. XLK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a 4.67% return, which is significantly lower than XLK's 28.25% return.
WMTI
- 1D
- 1.68%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 4.67%
- 6M
- 5.48%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLK
- 1D
- -4.14%
- 1M
- 2.23%
- YTD
- 28.25%
- 6M
- 26.51%
- 1Y
- 52.47%
- 3Y*
- 30.61%
- 5Y*
- 21.34%
- 10Y*
- 25.48%
WMTI vs. XLK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 4.67% | 9.99% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.25% | -4.48% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMTI and XLK is -0.18, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.18 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMTI vs. XLK — Risk / Return Rank
WMTI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLK
WMTI vs. XLK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMTI | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.38 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 3.31 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.56 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMTI vs. XLK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, smaller than the maximum XLK drawdown of -82.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and XLK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMTI | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.24% | -82.05% | +64.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -15.92% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -25.66% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.61% | -6.96% | -4.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.39% | -34.90% | +30.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.98% | — |
Volatility
WMTI vs. XLK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMTI | XLK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 12.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.70% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.50% | 23.48% | +4.02% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.50% | 25.37% | +2.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.50% | 24.71% | +2.79% |
WMTI vs. XLK - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than XLK's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMTI vs. XLK - Dividend Comparison
WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 22.65%, more than XLK's 0.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 22.65% | 3.36% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.43% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMTI and XLK have a correlation of -0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.
WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 22.65%, compared with 0.43% for XLK.
WMTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while XLK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 0.08% for XLK.
Find the right allocation for WMTI and XLK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer