WMTI vs. QQHG
WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and QQHG (Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WMTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while QQHG is a Equity Hedged fund actively managed by Invesco. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.15, they often move in opposite directions. WMTI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.45%/yr for QQHG.
Performance
WMTI vs. QQHG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a -0.90% return, which is significantly lower than QQHG's 8.21% return.
WMTI
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- -4.45%
- 6M
- -6.85%
- YTD
- -0.90%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQHG
- 1D
- -0.40%
- 1M
- -0.91%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- YTD
- 8.21%
- 1Y
- 18.13%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMTI vs. QQHG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | -0.90% | 9.99% |
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 8.21% | -1.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMTI and QQHG is -0.15, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | -0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMTI vs. QQHG — Risk / Return Rank
WMTI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQHG
WMTI vs. QQHG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF (QQHG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| WMTI | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.95 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.59 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
WMTI vs. QQHG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, which is greater than QQHG's maximum drawdown of -6.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and QQHG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMTI | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.60% | -6.18% | -14.42% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -6.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.32% | -3.14% | -13.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.59% | -1.07% | -4.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.72% | — |
Volatility
WMTI vs. QQHG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMTI | QQHG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.81% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.72% | 10.46% | +17.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 27.72% | 10.21% | +17.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 27.72% | 10.21% | +17.51% |
WMTI vs. QQHG - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than QQHG's 0.45% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMTI vs. QQHG - Dividend Comparison
WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.75%, more than QQHG's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
QQHG Invesco QQQ Hedged Advantage ETF | 0.26% | 0.17% |
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF | 26.75% | 3.36% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMTI and QQHG have a correlation of -0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQHG is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQHG is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.
WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 26.75%, compared with 0.26% for QQHG.
WMTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QQHG is Equity Hedged. They also come from different issuers: REX and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 0.45% for QQHG.
Find the right allocation for WMTI and QQHG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer