WMTI vs. AIVC

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

WMTI (REX WMT Growth & Income ETF) and AIVC (Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WMTI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by REX, while AIVC is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Bloomberg AI Value Chain Index. WMTI is actively managed, while AIVC is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.19, they often move in opposite directions. WMTI charges 0.99%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for AIVC.

Performance

WMTI vs. AIVC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMTI achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than AIVC's 57.90% return.

WMTI

• 1D: 0.69%
• 1M: -6.82%
• 6M: -5.95%
• YTD: -0.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

AIVC

• 1D: -3.29%
• 1M: -4.46%
• 6M: 49.97%
• YTD: 57.90%
• 1Y: 99.15%
• 3Y*: 42.39%
• 5Y*: 16.25%
• 10Y*: 15.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMTI vs. AIVC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	-0.96%	9.99%
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	57.90%	-6.42%

Correlation

The correlation between WMTI and AIVC is -0.19, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025	-0.19

Return for Risk

WMTI vs. AIVC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMTI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

AIVC

AIVC Risk / Return Rank: 92
AIVC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
AIVC Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
AIVC Omega Ratio Rank: 88
AIVC Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
AIVC Martin Ratio Rank: 93

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMTI vs. AIVC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF (AIVC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WMTI	AIVC	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.98	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	3.30	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.43	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	7.07	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	19.27	—

Drawdowns

WMTI vs. AIVC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -20.60%, smaller than the maximum AIVC drawdown of -56.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and AIVC.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMTI	AIVC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.60%	-56.11%	+35.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.11%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-32.55%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-53.58%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-56.11%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-16.37%	-13.18%	-3.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.33%	-16.35%	+11.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	5.16%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	WMTI	AIVC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	13.71%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	28.26%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.90%	33.57%	-5.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.90%	31.03%	-3.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	27.90%	27.29%	+0.61%

WMTI vs. AIVC - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than AIVC's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMTI vs. AIVC - Dividend Comparison

WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 26.01%, more than AIVC's 0.11% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
AIVC Amplify Bloomberg AI Value Chain ETF	0.11%	0.17%	0.21%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.39%	1.16%	0.38%	0.92%	0.64%
WMTI REX WMT Growth & Income ETF	26.01%	3.36%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMTI and AIVC in my portfolio?

WMTI and AIVC have a correlation of -0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, WMTI or AIVC?

On fees, AIVC is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, WMTI or AIVC?

AIVC is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, WMTI or AIVC?

WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 26.01%, compared with 0.11% for AIVC.

What is the main difference between WMTI and AIVC?

WMTI is categorized as Derivative Income, while AIVC is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: REX and Amplify. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 0.59% for AIVC.