PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMTI vs. ACII
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMTI vs. ACII - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


WMTI

1D
4.18%
1M
-10.43%
YTD
2.10%
6M
-0.33%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ACII

1D
-0.95%
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMTI vs. ACII - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between WMTI and ACII is -0.80, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026

-0.80

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMTI vs. ACII - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for REX WMT Growth & Income ETF (WMTI) and Innovator Index Autocallable Income Strategy ETF (ACII). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

WMTI vs. ACII - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMTIACIIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

-7.55

+8.34

Drawdowns

WMTI vs. ACII - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMTI drawdown since its inception was -17.24%, which is greater than ACII's maximum drawdown of -1.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMTI and ACII.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMTIACIIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-17.24%

-1.27%

-15.97%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-13.78%

-1.27%

-12.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.77%

-0.42%

-3.35%

Volatility

WMTI vs. ACII - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMTIACIIDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.30%

7.65%

+20.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.30%

7.65%

+20.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

28.30%

7.65%

+20.65%

WMTI vs. ACII - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMTI has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is higher than ACII's 0.79% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMTI vs. ACII - Dividend Comparison

WMTI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.32%, more than ACII's 0.74% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


WMTI and ACII have a correlation of -0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ACII is cheaper at 0.79% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ACII is cheaper with a 0.79% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for WMTI.

WMTI has the higher dividend yield at 21.32%, compared with 0.74% for ACII.

They also come from different issuers: REX and Innovator. Their fees differ too: 0.99% for WMTI and 0.79% for ACII.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMTI and ACII

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer