PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMT vs. TXRH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WMT vs. TXRH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMT achieves a 7.98% return, which is significantly higher than TXRH's 1.95% return. Over the past 10 years, WMT has outperformed TXRH with an annualized return of 19.62%, while TXRH has yielded a comparatively lower 15.77% annualized return.


WMT

1D
0.80%
1M
-8.13%
YTD
7.98%
6M
6.15%
1Y
23.97%
3Y*
34.37%
5Y*
22.47%
10Y*
19.62%

TXRH

1D
-1.57%
1M
-5.01%
YTD
1.95%
6M
2.54%
1Y
-12.60%
3Y*
17.69%
5Y*
12.92%
10Y*
15.77%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMT vs. TXRH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMT
Walmart Inc.
7.98%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%-3.43%46.56%
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.95%-6.57%49.78%37.15%4.16%15.71%39.83%-3.62%15.11%11.16%

Correlation

The correlation between WMT and TXRH is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.18

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2004

0.25

The correlation between WMT and TXRH shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WMT:

$958.52B

TXRH:

$11.09B

EPS

WMT:

$2.88

TXRH:

$6.26

PE Ratio

WMT:

41.62

TXRH:

26.81

PEG Ratio

WMT:

2.72

TXRH:

1.67

PS Ratio

WMT:

1.32

TXRH:

1.84

Total Revenue (TTM)

WMT:

$725.31B

TXRH:

$6.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WMT:

$181.16B

TXRH:

$1.14B

EBITDA (TTM)

WMT:

$44.32B

TXRH:

$701.29M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMT vs. TXRH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

TXRH
TXRH Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
TXRH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TXRH Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
TXRH Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
TXRH Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
TXRH Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMT vs. TXRH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMTTXRHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

0.95

+0.25

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.53

-0.65

+2.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.02

-1.12

+6.14

WMT vs. TXRH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is higher than the TXRH Sharpe Ratio of -0.43. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMT and TXRH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMTTXRHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

-0.43

+1.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.04

0.42

+0.62

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

0.44

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.64

0.41

+0.23

Drawdowns

WMT vs. TXRH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMT drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, roughly equal to the maximum TXRH drawdown of -76.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMT and TXRH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMTTXRHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.14%

-76.59%

-0.55%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.75%

-19.61%

+3.86%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.93%

-24.82%

+2.89%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-30.45%

+4.71%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.74%

-58.04%

+32.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.71%

-16.01%

+5.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-16.15%

+1.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.79%

11.36%

-6.57%

Volatility

WMT vs. TXRH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Walmart Inc. (WMT) is 10.26%, while Texas Roadhouse, Inc. (TXRH) has a volatility of 15.63%. This indicates that WMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TXRH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMTTXRHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.26%

15.63%

-5.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.59%

22.41%

-3.82%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.72%

29.32%

-5.60%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.68%

30.59%

-8.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

35.62%

-13.89%

Dividends

WMT vs. TXRH - Dividend Comparison

WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.81%, less than TXRH's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TXRH
Texas Roadhouse, Inc.
1.70%1.64%1.35%1.80%2.02%1.34%0.46%2.13%1.68%1.59%1.58%1.90%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.81%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

WMT vs. TXRH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Walmart Inc. and Texas Roadhouse, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
177.75B
1.63B
(WMT) Total Revenue
(TXRH) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

WMT vs. TXRH - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Walmart Inc. and Texas Roadhouse, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%30.0%20222023202420252026
25.1%
30.6%
Portfolio components
WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

TXRH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a gross profit of 499.53M and revenue of 1.63B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.6%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

TXRH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported an operating income of 146.34M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.0%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.

TXRH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Texas Roadhouse, Inc. reported a net income of 123.43M and revenue of 1.63B, resulting in a net margin of 7.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WMT and TXRH have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TXRH has higher volatility (15.63%) compared to WMT (10.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMT dropped -77.14% vs TXRH's -76.59%.

WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.02 vs -0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMT and TXRH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer