WMT vs. MSFT.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO).

Performance

WMT vs. MSFT.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

WMT vs. MSFT.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
WMT Walmart Inc.	11.78%	24.49%	73.99%	12.88%	-0.46%	6.33%
MSFT.TO Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged)	-24.65%	18.05%	2.47%	59.91%	-33.99%	15.81%

Different Trading Currencies

WMT is traded in USD, while MSFT.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the MSFT.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMT achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than MSFT.TO's -26.94% return.

WMT

• 1D: 0.63%
• 1M: -2.67%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 6M: 21.08%
• 1Y: 42.82%
• 3Y*: 37.81%
• 5Y*: 24.04%
• 10Y*: 20.48%

MSFT.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -10.73%
• YTD: -26.94%
• 6M: -31.20%
• 1Y: -2.66%
• 3Y*: 5.45%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

WMT vs. MSFT.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMT

WMT Risk / Return Rank: 90
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 89
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 89
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 86
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 92

MSFT.TO

MSFT.TO Risk / Return Rank: 35
MSFT.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
MSFT.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
MSFT.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 31
MSFT.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
MSFT.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 38

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMT vs. MSFT.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	WMT	MSFT.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.78	-0.10	+1.88
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.72	0.06	+2.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.01	+0.33
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.33	-0.12	+4.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	11.97	-0.34	+12.31
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

WMT vs. MSFT.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.78, which is higher than the MSFT.TO Sharpe Ratio of -0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMT and MSFT.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	WMT	MSFT.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.78	-0.10	+1.88
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.15	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.95	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.64	0.06	+0.58

Correlation

The correlation between WMT and MSFT.TO is 0.21, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

WMT vs. MSFT.TO - Dividend Comparison

WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.77%, less than MSFT.TO's 0.95% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
WMT Walmart Inc.	0.77%	0.84%	0.92%	1.45%	1.58%	1.52%	1.50%	1.78%	2.23%	2.07%	2.89%	3.20%
MSFT.TO Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged)	0.95%	0.71%	0.73%	0.75%	1.07%	0.18%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

WMT vs. MSFT.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMT drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, which is greater than MSFT.TO's maximum drawdown of -42.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMT and MSFT.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMT	MSFT.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-77.14%	-37.95%	-39.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.92%	-34.43%	+23.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.74%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-25.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.99%	-32.18%	+25.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.66%	-11.89%	-2.77%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.95%	12.81%	-8.86%

Volatility

WMT vs. MSFT.TO - Volatility Comparison

Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Microsoft CDR (CAD Hedged) (MSFT.TO) have volatilities of 5.96% and 6.22%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WMT	MSFT.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.96%	6.22%	-0.26%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.03%	19.79%	-2.76%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.35%	27.62%	-3.27%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.09%	29.48%	-8.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.70%	29.48%	-7.78%

Financials