PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMT vs. EDIT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WMT vs. EDIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMT achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than EDIT's 21.95% return. Over the past 10 years, WMT has outperformed EDIT with an annualized return of 19.77%, while EDIT has yielded a comparatively lower -22.22% annualized return.


WMT

1D
0.45%
1M
-7.92%
YTD
9.07%
6M
4.13%
1Y
29.24%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
22.42%
10Y*
19.77%

EDIT

1D
2.46%
1M
-4.58%
YTD
21.95%
6M
-1.19%
1Y
26.90%
3Y*
-39.82%
5Y*
-41.79%
10Y*
-22.22%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMT vs. EDIT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMT
Walmart Inc.
9.07%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%-3.43%46.56%
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.
21.95%61.42%-87.46%14.21%-66.59%-62.13%136.78%30.15%-25.97%89.34%

Correlation

The correlation between WMT and EDIT is -0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 3, 2016

0.11

The correlation between WMT and EDIT shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WMT:

$968.20B

EDIT:

$244.70M

EPS

WMT:

$2.88

EDIT:

-$1.21

PS Ratio

WMT:

1.34

EDIT:

6.29

PB Ratio

WMT:

10.26

EDIT:

55.51

Total Revenue (TTM)

WMT:

$725.31B

EDIT:

$35.86M

Gross Profit (TTM)

WMT:

$181.16B

EDIT:

$35.86M

EBITDA (TTM)

WMT:

$44.32B

EDIT:

-$76.66M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMT vs. EDIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

EDIT
EDIT Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
EDIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EDIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
EDIT Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
EDIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
EDIT Martin Ratio Rank: 4848
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMT vs. EDIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMTEDITDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.06

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.11

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

0.25

+1.58

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.82

0.43

+5.39

WMT vs. EDIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the EDIT Sharpe Ratio of 0.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMT and EDIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMT vs. EDIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMT drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, smaller than the maximum EDIT drawdown of -98.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMT and EDIT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMTEDITDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.14%

-98.92%

+21.78%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.75%

-59.88%

+44.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.93%

-91.18%

+69.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-98.66%

+72.92%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.74%

-98.92%

+73.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.81%

-97.24%

+87.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-62.63%

+48.00%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

34.03%

-29.09%

Volatility

WMT vs. EDIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Walmart Inc. (WMT) is 9.86%, while Editas Medicine, Inc. (EDIT) has a volatility of 32.34%. This indicates that WMT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMTEDITDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.86%

32.34%

-22.48%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

61.63%

-43.14%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.67%

94.75%

-71.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.68%

94.12%

-72.44%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

83.80%

-62.07%

Dividends

WMT vs. EDIT - Dividend Comparison

WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, while EDIT has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EDIT
Editas Medicine, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

WMT vs. EDIT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Walmart Inc. and Editas Medicine, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00B100.00B150.00B200.00B20222023202420252026
177.75B
0
(WMT) Total Revenue
(EDIT) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


WMT and EDIT have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EDIT has higher volatility (32.34%) compared to WMT (9.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMT dropped -77.14% vs EDIT's -98.92%.

WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMT and EDIT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer