PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMT vs. ASCCY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

WMT vs. ASCCY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMT achieves a 9.07% return, which is significantly lower than ASCCY's 17.57% return.


WMT

1D
0.45%
1M
-7.93%
YTD
9.07%
6M
4.13%
1Y
28.71%
3Y*
34.18%
5Y*
22.42%
10Y*
19.77%

ASCCY

1D
-0.95%
1M
-4.58%
YTD
17.57%
6M
13.17%
1Y
15.77%
3Y*
54.90%
5Y*
36.39%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMT vs. ASCCY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMT
Walmart Inc.
9.07%24.49%73.99%12.88%-0.46%1.97%23.32%30.16%-3.43%26.54%
ASCCY
Asics Corp ADR
17.57%21.77%152.83%43.48%1.37%10.10%18.67%27.61%-13.67%-0.86%

Correlation

The correlation between WMT and ASCCY is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.04

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 3, 2017

0.04

The correlation between WMT and ASCCY shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.06 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

WMT:

$968.20B

ASCCY:

$19.93B

EPS

WMT:

$2.88

ASCCY:

¥161.60

PE Ratio

WMT:

42.04

ASCCY:

27.86

PEG Ratio

WMT:

2.75

ASCCY:

0.33

PS Ratio

WMT:

1.34

ASCCY:

3.63

PB Ratio

WMT:

10.26

ASCCY:

10.05

Total Revenue (TTM)

WMT:

$725.31B

ASCCY:

¥885.06B

Gross Profit (TTM)

WMT:

$181.16B

ASCCY:

¥476.81B

EBITDA (TTM)

WMT:

$44.32B

ASCCY:

¥190.22B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMT vs. ASCCY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMT
WMT Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
WMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 7373
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMT Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
WMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMT Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

ASCCY
ASCCY Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ASCCY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASCCY Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASCCY Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASCCY Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASCCY Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMT vs. ASCCY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMTASCCYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.83

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.10

+0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.83

0.76

+1.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.82

1.42

+4.41

WMT vs. ASCCY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMT Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is higher than the ASCCY Sharpe Ratio of 0.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMT and ASCCY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMT vs. ASCCY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMT drawdown since its inception was -77.14%, which is greater than ASCCY's maximum drawdown of -64.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMT and ASCCY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMTASCCYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-77.14%

-64.92%

-12.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.75%

-20.82%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.93%

-27.09%

+5.16%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.74%

-47.44%

+21.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.74%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-9.81%

-12.05%

+2.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.63%

-18.12%

+3.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.94%

11.17%

-6.23%

Volatility

WMT vs. ASCCY - Volatility Comparison

Walmart Inc. (WMT) and Asics Corp ADR (ASCCY) have volatilities of 9.86% and 9.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMTASCCYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.86%

9.57%

+0.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.49%

29.02%

-10.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.67%

41.05%

-17.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.68%

44.88%

-23.20%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

47.06%

-25.33%

Dividends

WMT vs. ASCCY - Dividend Comparison

WMT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.80%, more than ASCCY's 0.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ASCCY
Asics Corp ADR
0.29%0.34%0.69%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMT
Walmart Inc.
0.80%0.84%0.92%1.45%1.58%1.52%1.50%1.78%2.23%2.07%2.89%3.20%

Financials

WMT vs. ASCCY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Walmart Inc. and Asics Corp ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


100.00B150.00B200.00B250.00B20222023202420252026
177.75B
275.23B
(WMT) Total Revenue
(ASCCY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. WMT values in USD, ASCCY values in JPY

WMT vs. ASCCY - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Walmart Inc. and Asics Corp ADR over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
25.1%
51.8%
Portfolio components
WMT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a gross profit of 44.69B and revenue of 177.75B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 25.1%.

ASCCY - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a gross profit of 142.55B and revenue of 275.23B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 51.8%.

WMT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported an operating income of 7.49B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in an operating margin of 4.2%.

ASCCY - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported an operating income of 61.88B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in an operating margin of 22.5%.

WMT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Walmart Inc. reported a net income of 5.65B and revenue of 177.75B, resulting in a net margin of 3.2%.

ASCCY - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Asics Corp ADR reported a net income of 47.43B and revenue of 275.23B, resulting in a net margin of 17.2%.


Frequently Asked Questions


WMT and ASCCY have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMT has higher volatility (9.86%) compared to ASCCY (9.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMT dropped -77.14% vs ASCCY's -64.92%.

WMT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.22 vs 0.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMT and ASCCY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer