WMOT.DE vs. LCUS.DE
WMOT.DE (VanEck Morningstar US Wide Moat UCITS ETF A Acc) and LCUS.DE (Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds - WMOT.DE tracks the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index while LCUS.DE tracks the Russell 1000 TR USD. Both are passively managed. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WMOT.DE charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for LCUS.DE.
Performance
WMOT.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
WMOT.DE
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 13.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
LCUS.DE
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WMOT.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WMOT.DE VanEck Morningstar US Wide Moat UCITS ETF A Acc | 0.30% | 1.01% | 18.31% |
LCUS.DE Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 3.40% | 31.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMOT.DE and LCUS.DE is 0.37, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024 | 0.37 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMOT.DE vs. LCUS.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WMOT.DE
LCUS.DE
WMOT.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar US Wide Moat UCITS ETF A Acc (WMOT.DE) and Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist (LCUS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMOT.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.98 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMOT.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | — | — |
Drawdowns
WMOT.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMOT.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.87% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.09% | — | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | — | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | — | — |
Volatility
WMOT.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMOT.DE | LCUS.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.23% | — | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | — | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | — | — |
WMOT.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMOT.DE has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than LCUS.DE's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMOT.DE vs. LCUS.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WMOT.DE nor LCUS.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
LCUS.DE Lyxor Core US Equity (DR) UCITS ETF - Dist | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.84% | 0.78% | 2.27% | 1.12% | 1.52% | 1.10% | 1.30% |
WMOT.DE VanEck Morningstar US Wide Moat UCITS ETF A Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
WMOT.DE and LCUS.DE have a correlation of 0.37, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, LCUS.DE is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
LCUS.DE is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for WMOT.DE.
WMOT.DE tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while LCUS.DE tracks Russell 1000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for WMOT.DE and 0.04% for LCUS.DE.
Find the right allocation for WMOT.DE and LCUS.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer