WMOT.DE vs. VVSM.DE
WMOT.DE (VanEck Morningstar US Wide Moat UCITS ETF A Acc) and VVSM.DE (VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - WMOT.DE is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while VVSM.DE is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped ESG Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, WMOT.DE returned 13.43% vs 162.55% for VVSM.DE. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. WMOT.DE charges 0.46%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for VVSM.DE.
Performance
WMOT.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMOT.DE achieves a 0.30% return, which is significantly lower than VVSM.DE's 86.02% return.
WMOT.DE
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 3.96%
- YTD
- 0.30%
- 6M
- -0.44%
- 1Y
- 13.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
VVSM.DE
- 1D
- -2.77%
- 1M
- 17.60%
- YTD
- 86.02%
- 6M
- 84.42%
- 1Y
- 162.55%
- 3Y*
- 56.95%
- 5Y*
- 38.05%
- 10Y*
- —
WMOT.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
WMOT.DE VanEck Morningstar US Wide Moat UCITS ETF A Acc | 0.30% | 1.01% | 18.31% |
VVSM.DE VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF | 86.02% | 33.22% | 32.58% |
Correlation
The correlation between WMOT.DE and VVSM.DE is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 18, 2024 | 0.43 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
WMOT.DE vs. VVSM.DE — Risk / Return Rank
WMOT.DE
VVSM.DE
WMOT.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Morningstar US Wide Moat UCITS ETF A Acc (WMOT.DE) and VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (VVSM.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMOT.DE | VVSM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -4.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.68 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.17 | 14.16 | -12.99 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.98 | 48.94 | -45.96 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMOT.DE | VVSM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 5.17 | -4.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.21 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.51 | 1.24 | -0.73 |
Drawdowns
WMOT.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMOT.DE drawdown since its inception was -25.87%, smaller than the maximum VVSM.DE drawdown of -37.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMOT.DE and VVSM.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMOT.DE | VVSM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.87% | -37.64% | +11.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.29% | -11.65% | +0.36% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -37.53% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -37.64% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.09% | -2.77% | -1.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.77% | -10.22% | +4.45% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 3.38% | +1.07% |
Volatility
WMOT.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for VanEck Morningstar US Wide Moat UCITS ETF A Acc (WMOT.DE) is 3.61%, while VanEck Semiconductor UCITS ETF (VVSM.DE) has a volatility of 12.04%. This indicates that WMOT.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VVSM.DE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| WMOT.DE | VVSM.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.61% | 12.04% | -8.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.03% | 24.35% | -15.32% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.23% | 31.92% | -18.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 31.15% | -15.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.42% | 30.81% | -15.39% |
WMOT.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMOT.DE has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is higher than VVSM.DE's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
WMOT.DE vs. VVSM.DE - Dividend Comparison
Neither WMOT.DE nor VVSM.DE has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
WMOT.DE and VVSM.DE have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, VVSM.DE is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
VVSM.DE is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for WMOT.DE.
WMOT.DE is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while VVSM.DE is Semiconductors. WMOT.DE tracks Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index, while VVSM.DE tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 10% Capped ESG Index. Their fees differ too: 0.46% for WMOT.DE and 0.35% for VVSM.DE.
Find the right allocation for WMOT.DE and VVSM.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer