WMLIX vs. WRAIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund (WMLIX) and Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX).
WMLIX is managed by Wilmington Funds. It was launched on Jul 1, 2003. WRAIX is managed by Wilmington Funds. It was launched on Jan 11, 2012.
Performance
WMLIX vs. WRAIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
WMLIX vs. WRAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMLIX Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund | -6.95% | 17.02% | 24.27% | 26.23% | -18.93% | 26.26% | 20.95% | 36.37% | -4.93% | 21.98% |
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund | -2.64% | 9.13% | 7.74% | 7.73% | -3.41% | 6.52% | 1.04% | 12.34% | -2.67% | 9.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, WMLIX achieves a -6.95% return, which is significantly lower than WRAIX's -2.64% return. Over the past 10 years, WMLIX has outperformed WRAIX with an annualized return of 13.97%, while WRAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.78% annualized return.
WMLIX
- 1D
- -0.39%
- 1M
- -7.67%
- YTD
- -6.95%
- 6M
- -4.77%
- 1Y
- 14.12%
- 3Y*
- 16.76%
- 5Y*
- 10.54%
- 10Y*
- 13.97%
WRAIX
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- -4.63%
- YTD
- -2.64%
- 6M
- -1.38%
- 1Y
- 4.04%
- 3Y*
- 6.90%
- 5Y*
- 4.68%
- 10Y*
- 4.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
WMLIX vs. WRAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
WMLIX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than WRAIX's 1.24% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
WMLIX vs. WRAIX — Risk / Return Rank
WMLIX
WRAIX
WMLIX vs. WRAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund (WMLIX) and Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| WMLIX | WRAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.81 | 0.55 | +0.26 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.26 | 0.84 | +0.42 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.13 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.01 | 0.77 | +0.24 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.90 | 3.10 | +1.80 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| WMLIX | WRAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.81 | 0.55 | +0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.74 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.76 | 0.72 | +0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.62 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between WMLIX and WRAIX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
WMLIX vs. WRAIX - Dividend Comparison
WMLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.13%, more than WRAIX's 0.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WMLIX Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund | 13.13% | 12.22% | 7.56% | 6.47% | 12.73% | 5.47% | 9.13% | 9.34% | 6.57% | 1.55% | 1.81% | 8.28% |
WRAIX Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund | 0.18% | 0.17% | 1.47% | 1.31% | 2.77% | 0.52% | 1.98% | 1.15% | 1.25% | 1.15% | 0.30% | 2.38% |
Drawdowns
WMLIX vs. WRAIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum WMLIX drawdown since its inception was -55.02%, which is greater than WRAIX's maximum drawdown of -15.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMLIX and WRAIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| WMLIX | WRAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.02% | -15.44% | -39.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.30% | -5.03% | -7.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.01% | -9.24% | -15.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.27% | -15.44% | -18.83% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.84% | -4.83% | -4.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.45% | -1.99% | -5.46% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.53% | 1.25% | +1.28% |
Volatility
WMLIX vs. WRAIX - Volatility Comparison
Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund (WMLIX) has a higher volatility of 4.28% compared to Wilmington Global Alpha Equities Fund (WRAIX) at 2.70%. This indicates that WMLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than WRAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| WMLIX | WRAIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.28% | 2.70% | +1.58% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.12% | 4.56% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.26% | 8.07% | +10.19% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.19% | 6.39% | +10.80% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.33% | 6.68% | +11.65% |