WMLIX vs. RCKSX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

WMLIX (Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund) and RCKSX (Rock Oak Core Growth Fund) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, WMLIX returned 15.75%/yr vs 11.11%/yr for RCKSX. Their correlation of 0.88 suggests significant overlap in exposure. WMLIX charges 0.25%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for RCKSX.

Performance

WMLIX vs. RCKSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund (WMLIX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMLIX achieves a 9.87% return, which is significantly lower than RCKSX's 15.47% return. Over the past 10 years, WMLIX has outperformed RCKSX with an annualized return of 15.75%, while RCKSX has yielded a comparatively lower 11.11% annualized return.

WMLIX

• 1D: 1.06%
• 1M: 0.63%
• YTD: 9.87%
• 6M: 9.21%
• 1Y: 26.16%
• 3Y*: 20.45%
• 5Y*: 13.13%
• 10Y*: 15.75%

RCKSX

• 1D: 0.13%
• 1M: 0.60%
• YTD: 15.47%
• 6M: 13.59%
• 1Y: 22.04%
• 3Y*: 18.76%
• 5Y*: 8.36%
• 10Y*: 11.11%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMLIX vs. RCKSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
WMLIX Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund	9.87%	17.02%	24.27%	26.23%	-18.93%	26.26%	20.95%	36.37%	-4.93%	21.98%
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund	15.47%	12.99%	15.12%	15.57%	-18.09%	9.96%	13.75%	19.05%	-2.14%	22.69%

Correlation

The correlation between WMLIX and RCKSX is 0.64, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.64
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.73
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.82
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2005	0.88

Over the past year, the correlation between WMLIX and RCKSX has dropped to 0.64 - well below their long-term average of 0.88, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

WMLIX vs. RCKSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMLIX

WMLIX Risk / Return Rank: 61
WMLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
WMLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
WMLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
WMLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
WMLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 75

RCKSX

RCKSX Risk / Return Rank: 62
RCKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
RCKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
RCKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 38
RCKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
RCKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 83

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMLIX vs. RCKSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund (WMLIX) and Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	WMLIX	RCKSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.08	1.86	+0.22
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.82	2.68	+0.14
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.31	+0.07
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.94	5.26	-2.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.13	14.52	-1.38

WMLIX vs. RCKSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMLIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.08, which is comparable to the RCKSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMLIX and RCKSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

WMLIX vs. RCKSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMLIX drawdown since its inception was -55.02%, roughly equal to the maximum RCKSX drawdown of -57.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMLIX and RCKSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	WMLIX	RCKSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.02%	-57.88%	+2.86%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.84%	-4.14%	-4.70%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-19.15%	-18.22%	-0.93%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-25.01%	-22.54%	-2.47%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-34.27%	-33.10%	-1.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.31%	-0.46%	-0.85%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.39%	-9.48%	+2.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.98%	1.50%	+0.48%

Volatility

WMLIX vs. RCKSX - Volatility Comparison

Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund (WMLIX) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to Rock Oak Core Growth Fund (RCKSX) at 3.30%. This indicates that WMLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RCKSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	WMLIX	RCKSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.77%	3.30%	+1.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.91%	8.09%	+1.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.53%	11.73%	+0.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.32%	15.65%	+1.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.40%	17.55%	+0.85%

WMLIX vs. RCKSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMLIX has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is lower than RCKSX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

WMLIX vs. RCKSX - Dividend Comparison

WMLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.26%, more than RCKSX's 5.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
RCKSX Rock Oak Core Growth Fund	5.42%	6.26%	0.47%	0.71%	1.00%	4.31%	16.56%	3.18%	0.59%	5.91%	0.70%	3.21%
WMLIX Wilmington Large-Cap Strategy Fund	11.26%	12.22%	7.56%	6.47%	12.73%	5.47%	9.13%	9.34%	6.57%	1.55%	1.81%	8.28%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both WMLIX and RCKSX in my portfolio?

WMLIX and RCKSX have a correlation of 0.64, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, WMLIX or RCKSX?

WMLIX has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to RCKSX (3.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMLIX dropped -55.02% vs RCKSX's -57.88%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

WMLIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.08 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.