PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMBLX vs. WMKGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMBLX vs. WMKGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WesMark Balanced Fund (WMBLX) and WesMark Large Company Fund (WMKGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMBLX achieves a 8.91% return, which is significantly lower than WMKGX's 12.42% return. Over the past 10 years, WMBLX has underperformed WMKGX with an annualized return of 7.43%, while WMKGX has yielded a comparatively higher 14.13% annualized return.


WMBLX

1D
0.41%
1M
0.76%
YTD
8.91%
6M
8.74%
1Y
19.96%
3Y*
11.18%
5Y*
6.68%
10Y*
7.43%

WMKGX

1D
1.10%
1M
1.81%
YTD
12.42%
6M
11.91%
1Y
32.69%
3Y*
20.45%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
14.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMBLX vs. WMKGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
WMBLX
WesMark Balanced Fund
8.91%10.81%9.28%4.97%-7.22%15.85%2.82%20.32%-4.61%10.77%
WMKGX
WesMark Large Company Fund
12.42%16.60%21.35%21.94%-21.71%25.97%26.40%26.58%-6.36%24.23%

Correlation

The correlation between WMBLX and WMKGX is 0.80, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.80

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.76

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.83

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 24, 1998

0.91

The correlation between WMBLX and WMKGX shifts across timeframes, from 0.76 (3 years) to 0.91 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMBLX vs. WMKGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMBLX
WMBLX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
WMBLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8989
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMBLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMBLX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
WMBLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMBLX Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

WMKGX
WMKGX Risk / Return Rank: 6767
Overall Rank
WMKGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMKGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMKGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
WMKGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMKGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMBLX vs. WMKGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WesMark Balanced Fund (WMBLX) and WesMark Large Company Fund (WMKGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


WMBLXWMKGXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.44

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.51

1.41

+0.11

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.05

2.94

+1.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.36

12.42

+3.94

WMBLX vs. WMKGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMBLX Sharpe Ratio is 2.72, which is comparable to the WMKGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMBLX and WMKGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

WMBLX vs. WMKGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMBLX drawdown since its inception was -35.88%, smaller than the maximum WMKGX drawdown of -49.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMBLX and WMKGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMBLXWMKGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.88%

-49.55%

+13.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

-11.06%

+6.09%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.57%

-21.35%

+9.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.77%

-31.06%

+13.29%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-23.30%

-34.60%

+11.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-1.43%

+0.28%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.37%

-9.64%

+3.27%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.23%

2.62%

-1.39%

Volatility

WMBLX vs. WMKGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WesMark Balanced Fund (WMBLX) is 2.93%, while WesMark Large Company Fund (WMKGX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that WMBLX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than WMKGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMBLXWMKGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.93%

5.38%

-2.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.90%

11.28%

-5.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.41%

14.28%

-6.87%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.26%

18.76%

-8.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.85%

19.29%

-8.44%

WMBLX vs. WMKGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMBLX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than WMKGX's 1.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMBLX vs. WMKGX - Dividend Comparison

WMBLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.89%, less than WMKGX's 18.81% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
WMBLX
WesMark Balanced Fund
6.89%7.70%9.82%4.70%3.78%6.03%1.63%6.20%5.83%4.32%3.80%6.73%
WMKGX
WesMark Large Company Fund
18.81%21.23%14.72%7.64%12.78%7.52%7.53%6.49%11.44%7.92%4.76%3.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


WMBLX and WMKGX have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

WMKGX has higher volatility (5.38%) compared to WMBLX (2.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMBLX dropped -35.88% vs WMKGX's -49.55%.

WMBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.72 vs 2.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMBLX and WMKGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer