PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
WMKSX vs. FECGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

WMKSX vs. FECGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, WMKSX achieves a 15.00% return, which is significantly lower than FECGX's 17.43% return.


WMKSX

1D
-0.18%
1M
1.63%
YTD
15.00%
6M
14.59%
1Y
32.75%
3Y*
23.52%
5Y*
10.25%
10Y*
13.21%

FECGX

1D
-0.49%
1M
4.54%
YTD
17.43%
6M
18.05%
1Y
40.50%
3Y*
18.44%
5Y*
5.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

WMKSX vs. FECGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
15.00%16.19%22.12%19.42%-20.72%22.81%36.78%5.01%
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
17.43%13.04%15.26%18.90%-26.17%2.83%34.41%7.11%

Correlation

The correlation between WMKSX and FECGX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.91

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 18, 2019

0.93

The correlation between WMKSX and FECGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.91 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

WMKSX vs. FECGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

WMKSX
WMKSX Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
WMKSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
WMKSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
WMKSX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
WMKSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
WMKSX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FECGX
FECGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FECGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FECGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
FECGX Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
FECGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
FECGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4747
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

WMKSX vs. FECGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) and Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


WMKSXFECGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.85

1.94

-0.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.61

2.66

-0.04

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.32

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.80

2.75

+1.05

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.72

9.93

+2.78

WMKSX vs. FECGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current WMKSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.85, which is comparable to the FECGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of WMKSX and FECGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


WMKSXFECGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.85

1.94

-0.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

0.24

+0.16

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.37

0.39

-0.02

Drawdowns

WMKSX vs. FECGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum WMKSX drawdown since its inception was -64.09%, which is greater than FECGX's maximum drawdown of -41.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for WMKSX and FECGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


WMKSXFECGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-64.09%

-41.85%

-22.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.50%

-14.81%

+6.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.20%

-28.45%

+4.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-39.84%

-40.34%

+0.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-39.84%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.94%

-0.87%

-0.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-15.68%

-15.77%

+0.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.54%

4.10%

-1.56%

Volatility

WMKSX vs. FECGX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WesMark Small Company Fund (WMKSX) is 4.74%, while Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund (FECGX) has a volatility of 6.43%. This indicates that WMKSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FECGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


WMKSXFECGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.74%

6.43%

-1.69%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.05%

15.86%

-3.81%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.73%

21.38%

-3.65%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.10%

24.54%

+1.56%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.97%

27.19%

-3.22%

WMKSX vs. FECGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

WMKSX has a 1.24% expense ratio, which is higher than FECGX's 0.05% expense ratio.


Dividends

WMKSX vs. FECGX - Dividend Comparison

WMKSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.92%, more than FECGX's 0.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FECGX
Fidelity Small Cap Growth Index Fund
0.46%0.54%1.25%0.81%0.80%3.43%1.00%0.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
WMKSX
WesMark Small Company Fund
19.92%22.91%4.69%5.93%6.23%25.75%8.21%0.00%12.53%8.59%5.26%6.57%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.91, WMKSX and FECGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FECGX has higher volatility (6.43%) compared to WMKSX (4.74%). In terms of maximum drawdown, WMKSX dropped -64.09% vs FECGX's -41.85%.

FECGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.94 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for WMKSX and FECGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer